What is important, the size of the board or the weight limitation of the board? - Page 2 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
SnowboardingForum.com is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-16-2011, 06:51 PM   #11 (permalink)
Veteran Member
earl_je's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Keystone, CO
Posts: 826

add this to your list to research:

Rome Artifact rocker
Never Summer Evo
Bataleon Evil Twin

...in 151 flavor.
earl_je is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 02-16-2011, 08:21 PM   #12 (permalink)
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 674

That Burton Board finder is stupid.
I did an aggressive freeride with No park and the Custom Flying V 148 was there at 100%.
I did an soft slower with park likely and the Custom Flying V 148 was there at 97%.

It's almost like they are trying to push that board...or maybe it's what they have in stock the most??? Phht...whatever. Don't trust that site.
rasmasyean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2011, 09:31 PM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
Listheeb21's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: North Shore, MA
Posts: 247

Originally Posted by JoeR View Post
Why is this still going on? If you read almost anything reasonably intelligent about snowboard sizing these days, it will state that weight is the key (or even the exclusive) factor. Why haven't all shop clerks gotten the message? What kind of bubble could they possibly be working in?
Happened to me the other day. I was checking out a Ride Highlife in the store and the shop kid came up and said it was a great board. I said I agree, but the one they had was too short for me. He held it up next to me and asked if I really thought a 159 was too short. I go 5'10", 210lbs., and don't look an ounce under 200. I wanted to strangle him!
Listheeb21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2011, 10:38 PM   #14 (permalink)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 65

Something everyone forgets is your boot size. Longer boards have wider waist widths. I'm about 5'7", 160lbs, with size 7 boots. Lots of people recommend a 155-157cm board for me at my weight but boards at those sizes may be too wide for me (most of these boards are above 25cm ww) to torsionally flex properly(unless it's a noodle).

Took me forever but I settled on a 153 Never Summer SL based on recommendations from NS and a person here. I was debating between the 153 (24.4cm ww) or 155 (25.1cm ww). Decided for my feet, the narrower board was the way to go. NS told me differences in flex between the 153 and 155 were minimal which helped make the decision even easier. Ride mainly blue groomers, trees, and in the bowls.
GeoFX is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums