Good and Bad with Rocker? - Page 2 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #11 of 15 (permalink) Old 03-05-2011, 03:06 AM
Veteran Member
 
Qball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Mt. Hood, Oregon
Posts: 1,284
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Out of the designs I've ridden (camber, reverse camber, rocker/camber), I 100% prefer rocker camber. I've been riding a 09/10 never summer sl for a while now and just recently purchase a 2011 smokin superpark. I've had two days on the Superpark and I think I like Smokin's version (Clash Rocker) of rocker/camber better. It has a much more mellow rocker shape then the NS and the camber sections aren't quite as aggressive, so that pivot point in the middle is not as noticeable, if there at all, when flat basing. This paired with their version of magnetraction makes for one killer freestyle board. The edge hold is ridiculous on it.
Qball is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 15 (permalink) Old 03-07-2011, 12:23 PM Thread Starter
Veteran Member
 
schmitty34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Probably at work wasting time
Posts: 881
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qball View Post
Out of the designs I've ridden (camber, reverse camber, rocker/camber), I 100% prefer rocker camber. I've been riding a 09/10 never summer sl for a while now and just recently purchase a 2011 smokin superpark. I've had two days on the Superpark and I think I like Smokin's version (Clash Rocker) of rocker/camber better. It has a much more mellow rocker shape then the NS and the camber sections aren't quite as aggressive, so that pivot point in the middle is not as noticeable, if there at all, when flat basing. This paired with their version of magnetraction makes for one killer freestyle board. The edge hold is ridiculous on it.

so in your opinion, is it a really nice advantage to have some form of mtx paired with the various forms of RC?

I rode the raygun and had fun, and then found a Turbo Dream (just a better version of the Raygun) on sale at a local shop. I'm very tempted to buy, but I also wonder if I'd rather have my first RC board also have mtx or something like it to help the edge hold on hard pack.

I rode a btx board a little bit last year and it felt pretty nice carving.
schmitty34 is offline  
post #13 of 15 (permalink) Old 03-07-2011, 04:11 PM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 674
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by schmitty34 View Post
so in your opinion, is it a really nice advantage to have some form of mtx paired with the various forms of RC?

I rode the raygun and had fun, and then found a Turbo Dream (just a better version of the Raygun) on sale at a local shop. I'm very tempted to buy, but I also wonder if I'd rather have my first RC board also have mtx or something like it to help the edge hold on hard pack.

I rode a btx board a little bit last year and it felt pretty nice carving.
I think the magnetraction is a must have if you encounter any hard/ice situations. Unless there is like some board with features you HAVE to have that you can't get with an equivalent MTX board, go for the MTX one. You won't be disappointed.

There will be those who claim they are so good and their edges are so sharp that it doesn't make a difference for them, but this is one feature where I say that's total BS. It's almost like saying shaped skis are useless when you are GOOD. You can argue that a good enough boarder doesn't need the forgivingness of RC and can press and butter out a cambered board easily, but I'd be really surprised if someone is so good they can make magnetraction redundant.

I always kept my edges sharp and now riding an MTX board, the worst I've slipped out on a surprise ice patch is like maybe putting my hand on the floor. And most of the time, it's carvable/skidable. And this is with a softer total RC board, which is supposed to reduce edge hold. And just the other day, it got icy and cold like at 3 PM and all my friends when to the lodge, and I skied by myself because...heck, I'm not going to lie and say that the ice wasn't a little slippier, but it's totally boarable on my flexy short skate banana. And I went on the last lift up too.

If you insist on going "racing speeds" (which prolly like <1% of the ppl actually do) there's actually boards with mellowed out magnetraction so that it won't slow you down as much with too many serations.

Last edited by rasmasyean; 03-07-2011 at 04:23 PM.
rasmasyean is offline  
post #14 of 15 (permalink) Old 03-07-2011, 04:39 PM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,124
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by linvillegorge View Post
The only rocker design that I've spent meaningful time on is NS's RC. I have been on others, but just a lap or two here and there. Not enough to fairly comment on them.

At first, I thought the RC seemed sketchy on groomers and hardpack. Before, I'd ridden camber exclusively. As I got more comfortable with the RC though, I actually don't feel that way any longer. You just have to lay into it a little harder. It doesn't bite as quick as camber does, but once you lay into it, it holds very well.
That's pretty similar to my experience as well. I'm not sure I'd describe it as having to "lay into it a little harder", but once I got used to the board and where the cambered tips engage, I found no real difference with edge hold on ice versus a camber. Basically because when the tips engage, your whole edge is pretty much in contact just like a camber.

Quote:
Originally Posted by linvillegorge View Post
The biggest thing that opened my eyes to this was doing some tests using my GPS on speed.
I dropped from a fast 164 camber to a 161 NS SL-R. I notice a slight drop in flat out speed, but I attribute that to the shorter length, not the different tech. I've ridden slower cambered boards in a 161.
Bones is offline  
post #15 of 15 (permalink) Old 03-07-2011, 04:57 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 132
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My first 2 years I was using a camber board, just got a burton custom v-rocker on sale last year and I am loving it. I ride 90% on hard pack groomers. I can bomb down mountains without being scared of catching an edge, turns our awesome, smooth as hell. It really does feel like I'm on a skateboard.

In a couple of weeks I'll be in some west coast powder, so we'll see how the board peforms out there.
zeeden is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome