Board for shorties (lightweights) - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 3 (permalink) Old 03-07-2011, 06:52 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 104
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Lightbulb Board for shorties (lightweights)

Hi Folks,

Time to stop renting so I'm looking for some recommendations and feedback for my first board. Slightly less choices since I'm lightweight and prefer freeride but freeride boards tend to be too long for me. The shorter boards I've researched tend to be geared for park which I'm not interested in yet.

Stats:
-Male
-125 lbs
-5' 3"
-Age 30s
-Boot size 7.5
-Freeride. No park.
-Intermediate skill level
-Mainly groomers and ice on east coast
-Normally ride 144 from rentals as my comfort zone
-Demoed 142 Nug, 148 Custom Flying V. The 148 felt too long for me as it was more challenging to turn, but I'm willing to try 148 again since I was experimenting with stance width and angles that day. The 142 was fun but I'm still looking.

Want:
-Stability at higher speeds
-Grips ice
-Ease of turns, can still flex considering my weight
-Allows me to continue progressing to advance

Candidates:
K2 Darkstar 149
Ride Crush 147
Bataleon Evil Twin 147
Capita Stairmaster 144

Been lurking here for a while and finally registered. Appreciate any replies. Thanks
Snowrax is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 3 (permalink) Old 03-09-2011, 06:55 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 104
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
After more research I've narrowed it down to the K2 Darkstar 149 and Lib Tech TRS C2BTX Slim 148. Any opinions on these two?

Also, I saw a post where someone mentioned Lib Tech measures their length longer, so subtract ~3. I assume this is because their measurement includes the curve from tip to tail. Example, a 148 Lib Tech is closer to a 145 standing straight with no curve included. Can anyone confirm this is accurate?
Snowrax is offline  
post #3 of 3 (permalink) Old 03-10-2011, 01:05 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 32
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
If you narrowed it down to those two, go with the LibTech. The magnetraction on it will be great for the ice and the hardpack snow on the east coast. Also, it has great flex and isn't as stiff as I thought. Basically, all your wants will be met with this board.
qUikSiLvEr is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome