Never Summer RC Tech vs. Lib-tech C2 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 9 (permalink) Old 03-15-2011, 06:10 AM Thread Starter
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: CNY
Posts: 685
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Never Summer RC Tech vs. Lib-tech C2

So I've never ridden a lib-tech board before, and I know that R.C. tech and c2 banana tech are compared. I noticed that RC tech starts after the inserts, while c2 banana tech starts from the inserts outward. I'm really curious as to how similarly stiff boards directly compare (such as Heritage vs. T.Rice for example). Obviously the NS boards have more rocker as a result of their design.

I'm hoping I can demo one next season just out of curiosity, but has anyone compared RC tech vs c2 tech directly?
phile00 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 9 (permalink) Old 03-15-2011, 07:56 AM
Leo
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Leo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Detroit Area
Posts: 6,230
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have. If you have read either of my Never Summer reviews, I compare the two camber profiles to each other.

Basically put, you can feel the rocker more on the Never Summer. However, because of their camber zone, when you initiate your turns, they really engage. The result is a better carving board to a directly comparable Lib Tech. Never Summer boards also have more pop and I believe the placement of the posi camber helps with it.

So basically, NS boards are super playful when you are buttering and pressing, yet they bite when you lay down fatty carves.

www.aGNARchy.com Reviews and David Z's rants
Leo is offline  
post #3 of 9 (permalink) Old 03-15-2011, 12:14 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Central PA
Posts: 395
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I pretty much agree with Leo on his observation...I rode last year's T.Rice 157 for a year and this season got a Heritage 162 because I felt the 157 was too short and wanted to try a NS. For sure the comment about the rocker being more noticeable is spot on, I find the Heritage to be more playful and at much faster edge to edge than the T.Rice. I also find it to feel softer and more playful than the T.Rice. The one thing I might contradict Leo on is the carving comment...now I don't have experience past these two models but I feel the T.Rice even given the 5cm shorter length held a great edge in a high speed carve. I'm not saying the Heritage doesn't but I think the T.Rice is right there with it and if it was the same length I can't imagine it would get worse.

Personally both boards are great but they ride differently.
Grasschopper is offline  
post #4 of 9 (permalink) Old 03-15-2011, 12:15 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 139
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I've own a 2010 SL from NS and a 2011 T.Rice and 2011 Jamie Lynn. The T.Rice and SL are very different beasts so I won't go into that. The SL(161) and Jamie(160) are somewhat comparable, with the Jamie being a bit stiffer. The rocker is definitely more pronounced on NS boards. I found the SL to be playful to the point where it was too squirly for me and now sits on the *shelf. I mounted up the SL last weekend to ride for the first time since purchasing my Libs to give it another shot, but I still prefer the Libs. I don't know if is the design of the RC Tech vs C2 or the other differences in the boards, but I just felt much more confident on C2. I'm of the different opinion than Leo, I found the Libs to be better carving boards. But I haven't been on a NS board designed for carving like the Haritage, Premier, etc.

*DISCLAIMER: I bought the wrong board. For how I like to ride I should have gone with the Heritage or the Premier. The SL is a great board, just doesn't suit me.
kingkoajmr is offline  
post #5 of 9 (permalink) Old 03-15-2011, 12:24 PM
Leo
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Leo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Detroit Area
Posts: 6,230
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Stiffness wise, I'd actually compare the T.Rice to a Raptor. The T.Rice is a stiff board.

I like carving more on a NS. When I go into carving tangents, I get pretty aggressive. I just feel that having the camber outside the bindings is better suited for carving purposes.

In terms of edge hold, the Lib's obviously hold better, but that's due to magnetraction, not C2. Without magnetraction, C2 wouldn't be nearly as good as RC in my opinion. Also, there's something I don't like about the serrated edges when you lay into deeper carves. You can feel the waviness of it.

With all of this said, C2 is by far my next favorite camber profile. It was my number 1 until I hopped on a NS RC.

The SL definitely isn't NS's best carving board so yea, can't compare that to the T.Rice.

www.aGNARchy.com Reviews and David Z's rants
Leo is offline  
post #6 of 9 (permalink) Old 03-15-2011, 12:32 PM
Veteran Member
 
schmitty34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Probably at work wasting time
Posts: 881
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Hmmmm...I just rode the Dark Series on Sunday and loved how it carves and still felt floaty in the powder. I agree that the rocker isn't really noticable, but it still handled the powder well at 161 despite it's rather large rider...me at 6'4'' 200. It also had real nice pop and was very stable on landing.

I've been looking at NS too so hopefully I'll have a chance to demo one and compare. I assume the Dark Series is comparable to the Premier or Raptor since it's pretty stiff as well.
schmitty34 is offline  
post #7 of 9 (permalink) Old 03-15-2011, 03:27 PM Thread Starter
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: CNY
Posts: 685
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Which NS board compares to a TRS c2?
phile00 is offline  
post #8 of 9 (permalink) Old 03-15-2011, 03:59 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 139
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by phile00 View Post
Which NS board compares to a TRS c2?
The closest comparison is probably the SL.
kingkoajmr is offline  
post #9 of 9 (permalink) Old 03-15-2011, 08:36 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Central PA
Posts: 395
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
@Leo - For sure the T.Rice is stiffer than the Heritage...I love the T.Rice for the kind of riding I want to do...but in reality I do most of my riding at a hill that is 500' vertical and has 5 (if you include the bunny slope) and two more if we get a ton of snow (no snow making) which we didn't this year. The quicker more playful Heritage is a better choice for my day to day riding but I assume it will still hold up if I do get out west to a big mountain.
Grasschopper is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome