NS Legacy size recommendations - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 7 (permalink) Old 04-10-2011, 04:57 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 20
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
NS Legacy size recommendations

I'm a new boarder, only been riding for a couple of years in MI, WI, and some CO. I know, WI right.
Anyway, I'm currently riding a Rome Manual 159 with Mission bindings.

I like the board, but looking to move to the NS without toe drag and looking at the Legacy. I do mostly groomers and buttering, but it's a lot of work with a cambered wide board.

Anyway, not sure what size to get, 156 or 159. I'm 5'10' and 190. I like the current length I ride, but thinking of something shorter to be more playful. I guess it's only 3cm so it's not that big of a deal, just looking for suggestions.

Thanks.
policeman51 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 7 (permalink) Old 04-10-2011, 07:36 PM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,129
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by policeman51 View Post
Anyway, I'm currently riding a Rome Manual 159 with Mission bindings.

I like the board, but looking to move to the NS without toe drag and looking at the Legacy. Anyway, not sure what size to get, 156 or 159. I'm 5'10' and 190. I like the current length I ride, but thinking of something shorter to be more playful.
What size are your feet? That should tell you whether you need the wide legacy or the regular SL.

If you want more playful and you're coming from a cambered board, then I'll think you'll get what you want in the same size NS RC board.

I'm 6'2", 190lb and I dropped from a stiff 164 camber to a 161 SL-R. I debated whether to drop further to a 158 and am very glad that I didn't. The RC tech makes the 161 as playful as 153-155 cambered board, but gives you the performance of a longer cambered board when you want it. The RC tech makes a big difference to the response and "playfulness" factor without sacrificing effective edge and speed.

Besides, you can unload an NS board on here any time you want.
Bones is offline  
post #3 of 7 (permalink) Old 04-10-2011, 07:53 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 20
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I wear a size 13. I have Vans Auras that I love. I wish I could squeeze into a 12, but no go.
My Rome is 26.4cm wide now. The 156 Legacy is 26.1cm wide, not sure if .3 cm would make a difference, but it might.

Man, i hear the best things about NS, my friends all have SLs and love them. I've been looking on the forums for one, but no go yet. I do like the graphics on the 2012 ones though. Basically the same, but with a little more color.
policeman51 is offline  
post #4 of 7 (permalink) Old 04-10-2011, 09:09 PM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,129
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by policeman51 View Post
I wear a size 13. My Rome is 26.4cm wide now. The 156 Legacy is 26.1cm wide, not sure if .3 cm would make a difference, but it might.
size 13...yeah, the Legacy is probably the better choice, an Sl is almost a centimeter narrower.

I dunno about dropping all the way down to a 156 though. That's gonna feel like a tiny little thing and I think you'd miss the 5cm of effective edge when you want to venture outside the park.

To each his own, but I think you're going to notice a big increase in "playfulness" just going from regular camber to RC tech in the same length. Drop a size in length and add in the tech change and the playfulness factor will go thru the roof.

At lower speeds (less force), the cambered tips aren't really engaged on the snow. You're riding on the edge between your feet, making it really easy to turn and spin. Feels like a much shorter board. Great for moguls/trees where the speed is not a concern. Add force/speed and the cambered tips get in contact and boom, you've got the whole effective edge engaged and it rides very close to the same length cambered board. Great for a higher speeds on groomers where edge hold at speed is a concern.

Problem is that shorter boards are a little softer and you're 190. There's a point at which speed is less of a factor and your weight alone will generate enough force to bend the board and engage the tips. Then you're effectively just riding a short cambered board and not really getting the benefits of RC Tech. If you're hucking it in the park all day and just want less board to thrw around, then okay.

I don't know where that magic point is, but I think you'd be fine on the 159. I'm your weight and on a 161. I could see dropping to a 159, maybe...if I had to, but a 156? I'd really notice that on the groomers.

Last edited by Bones; 04-10-2011 at 09:22 PM.
Bones is offline  
post #5 of 7 (permalink) Old 04-10-2011, 09:20 PM
Senior Member
 
conwayeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 208
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
How much time do you spend riding MI & WI compared to CO? You would probably be better off with the NS Revolver, true twin compared to the set back stance on the Legacy and its softer.
conwayeast is offline  
post #6 of 7 (permalink) Old 04-10-2011, 09:44 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 20
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks Bones, that explanation of how RC works makes total sense. I think I will shoot for the 159 or 161.
I was just going to MI and WI mostly, but my job has a long contract out in CO so I'll be going out that ways regularly the next few years.
policeman51 is offline  
post #7 of 7 (permalink) Old 04-11-2011, 03:32 PM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,129
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
159-161 are pretty popular sizes. If you decide that you want smaller, you won't have a problem selling it.

NS is based outta Denver, so maybe you can arrange a demo when your CO contract kicks in...lucky bastard.
Bones is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome