![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 (permalink) | |||
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sweden
Posts: 21
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,154
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,154
|
Quote:
My comment was purely in relation to width and your shoe size - basically the 162 is plenty/perfect in that respect and you do not need the added width of the 165. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 409
|
Ok, just read the thread. For starters people, the board does not have camrock, it's freeride fk. Similar in the general sense but feel different. Yes, the board rides shorter because of the rockered tips. Since you mention Japan, I'd say if you're going some place with lots of pow, then 162 would be good for you. If you're doing more groomers than anything then you could think about the 159
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,154
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|