Capita Black Snowboard of Death advice! - Page 4 - Snowboarding Forum

cc898 · 12-05-2012, 09:23 AM

Nobody said it had camrock, I said boards with camrock and SIMILAR profiles, as in early rise tech.

The 165 is a big deck, but if you want it strictly for the steep and deep....or mostly the deep, its not a bad choice. I rode 168 for many many years and loved it. In fact I am considering a new Unity in that size again.

Sboskov · 12-05-2012, 01:06 PM

damn after reading this, its making me think i should of gone even larger than my 158 machete...

Anticrobotic · 12-06-2012, 07:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cc898

The 165 is a big deck, but if you want it strictly for the steep and deep....or mostly the deep, its not a bad choice. I rode 168 for many many years and loved it. In fact I am considering a new Unity in that size again.

I guess I'll have to let function go before fashion.

Alternatively just bulk up a bit; I could use another 5-10 lbs of muscles...

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

12-05-2012, 09:23 AM	#31 (permalink)
cc898 Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Bozeman Posts: 139	Nobody said it had camrock, I said boards with camrock and SIMILAR profiles, as in early rise tech. The 165 is a big deck, but if you want it strictly for the steep and deep....or mostly the deep, its not a bad choice. I rode 168 for many many years and loved it. In fact I am considering a new Unity in that size again.

12-05-2012, 01:06 PM	#32 (permalink)
Sboskov Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Posts: 9	damn after reading this, its making me think i should of gone even larger than my 158 machete...