Never Summer Proto 154 or 157 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 5 (permalink) Old 08-23-2011, 09:29 PM Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 45
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Never Summer Proto 154 or 157

Hey all,

I am 175lbs 5'11 and ride on the East Coast

I cant decide which size Proto to get, i know the Proto has blunted tips which gives the sizing more of an effective edge.

So essentially the 154 rides like a 156 and the 157 rides like a 159.

I ride about 70% Freeride and 30% Park. I am looking for something to shred with but also something to kill it in the park.

Those with the Proto, is it true about the board riding like a longer board? Which size would you recommend for me?

Lians60 is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 5 (permalink) Old 08-24-2011, 08:46 AM
ecks's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: NYC
Posts: 413
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I would say it about a 3cm size up on the effective edge. I measuring the 157 Proto again a 160 Heritage and it had the same exact effective edge.

I rode the 157 and I'm 6'1 and about 185 and was able to bomb it down the hill while still being nimble enough to throw around.

I would say get the 157 but if you really want to kill it in the park you may want to size down to the 154.
ecks is offline  
post #3 of 5 (permalink) Old 08-24-2011, 12:08 PM
B.Gilly's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Berkshires
Posts: 774
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Could go either way with it. Honestly would say get the board closest to what you ride now with out going over in length unless you already wanted to size down some.

Edge hold handles like a longer board i guess is the best way to put it now that everyone has a form of rocker.

For whatever it helps I am about 2" shorter then you and 10 lbs lighter and felt fine on the 157.

The season is almost upon us!!!!

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by B.Gilly; 08-24-2011 at 12:18 PM.
B.Gilly is offline  
post #4 of 5 (permalink) Old 08-24-2011, 12:33 PM
Senior Member
MeanJoe's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 248
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
I've had my Proto CT 157 for a bit over a week in my office sitting right next to my NeverSummer SL 155. As I've gazed longingly at them side-by-side and prayed for an early winter, I've noticed that not only is the Proto a couple centimeters longer (155 SL vs. 157 Proto) but the Proto appears to be very much a larger board than the 157 designation. By that I mean that the difference between the two looks to be more than the 2 centimeters that the sizing would imply. I think this may be somewhat just perception over reality because the other thing I've noticed, the 157 seems to actually in fact be a larger board (say a 160) with a few centimeters cut off of the nose/tail to make the blunt shape. I know they don't actually cut down a larger board during manufacturing but the Proto's geometry, especially the longer effective edge of a standard board of the same size, makes the board seem like larger board that has been "blunted down" to a 157 length.

I've been honestly wondering if I made the wrong decision to get a 157 instead of a 154. I'm a bit large for a smaller board but the SL 155 has held up okay at my current weight. My concern was with a softer flexing board and my current weight that a 154 might be too small. Now, considering my observations comparing the two side-by-side I'm not so sure. If those observations are somewhat correct and a 154 would in fact be more equivalent to a 156-157 with the tip/tail cut off then perhaps I would have been better off with the 154.

MeanJoe is offline  
post #5 of 5 (permalink) Old 08-24-2011, 02:02 PM
Veteran Member
jdang307's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,929
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
I noticed that too! I got a 152 Evo but when I hold it, it feels much bigger. I laid it next to a 152 Flow Era (2011) and it seems like a much bigger board. I didn't lay them side by side so I'm not sure if the measurements are accurate on both, Maybe I will.

I think the blunted edges produces bigger "shoulders" so to speak, with the effective edge brought up.

Since I want to retain all mountain capabilities on the Evo I am really excited about this, we'll see when we get some damn snow
jdang307 is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome