Powder-Gun, Freeride, Big-Mountain, Hypersonic Piste-Weapon Selection - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 36 (permalink) Old 09-03-2011, 10:32 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Powder-Gun, Freeride, Big-Mountain, Hypersonic Piste-Weapon Selection

So in late July, after waiting through the second consecutive predominantly gray Pacific NW summer (what happened?), some synapse in my brain suddenly snapped and now all I can think about is boosting off a cliff in Squaw Valley with Motorhead playing at maximum volume and charging champagne powder for a couple hundred yards at Mach 7ÖÖ [sigh] A few more months

For some perspective, I ride a stiff binding/boot setup (Ride Double Agent at +15/+6 and Burton Driver X with inserts) on a 157cm 2004 Burton Omen currently. I am 5í10Ē (178cm), 165lb (75kg) plus a 10-15lb pack on occasion, 10.5 US boot (42-43 EUR), and a fairly advanced rider. I spend no time in the park, and thoroughly enjoy steeps, bowls, chutes, drops, open trees, and high-speed carving. I like a responsive and stable ride. The Omen has a smaller side-cut and is torsionally mellow, thus it becomes unstable at very high speed. Also, the camber and shorter length becomes a float issue in deep powder, even with a larger binding setback. I intend to continue riding the Omen for smaller resorts and poor conditions (unfortunately, a majority of the riding I do in the local Seattle area), though the new board would be my go-to for powder conditions, backcountry hiking, side-country, and larger resort riding (Whistler, Revelstoke, Squaw Valley, Mt. Baker, etc). The board would likely see a majority of powder and off-piste riding, though I want something that I can confidently push at maximum speed on very steep groomed and hardpacked trails with the same setup. If I go on a week-long trip, I only want to fly with one board, and I want that one board to levitate powder and obliterate groomers if the weather is indecisive.

The Omen is tons of fun for casual riding (extra surfy for leaning into turns for looser carving) and has treated me superbly. However, over the past few seasons, last winter in particular, Iíve increasingly arrived to a point where Iíve found myself on multiple occasions needing something longer, faster, stiffer, more stable, and more aggressive to keep up with my riding (and make my skier friends look bad ;). I need an animal of a board. I want to back off on the reins only when the terrain and fear of imminent mortality tells me to, not when my board gets jittery a third of the way through a gnarly line.

I am interested in a ~161-164cm length (towards the longer end of things for my frame, but still need to thread the occasional mogul field or dense glade) and a directional camrock profile. I like full cambered boards for their craving response, but I want to go with something different this time around (rockered boards that Iíve borrowed have been a blast). Full-magnetraction (even detuned) feels too digitally-grippy for me, but I do want something extra that will dig-in when I push it on mixed conditions and wind-blown traverses. I donít want much profile taper as to where trail-runs become squirrelly.

Basically, I want a board that will allow me to continue advancing my riding and negotiate bigger and more-technical terrain (including cat and heli access in future seasons), though is versatile enough to thoroughly enjoy for basic resort riding also. I would rather be punished for my riding mistakes and learn than not having enough headroom to ride harder. Going with my newfound self-improvement mantra of Ďcommit, go faster and turn lessí when things get scary, a big-mountain board design philosophy is right up my alley. I need a powder-gun quiver board that isnít a quiver board, but is much more specialized than an Ďall-mountainí board, if that makes sense.

Here are the prospects, in likely order of acquisition probability:

1) Jones Flagship 164 (maybe 161 or 163W?). GOOD: Camrock, mellow-mag, stiff nose, fast, ĎNideckerí deck. BAD?: heavy (true?), low dampening = brutal time for exclusive groomer days?, unknown changes from 2011 to 2012?

2) Nidecker Ultralight 163. GOOD: Carbon topsheet, camrock (supposedly stellar profile), serrated edges, stiff, damp, light, fast, probably a better overall board than the Flagship. BAD?: Prohibitively pricey (potentially worth it?), where do I get one?

3) Nidecker Megalight 163. GOOD: See previous, less expensive than the Ultra (might actually be Candidate #1 if the $200 gap from the Jones is well-spent???). BAD?: See previous, comparative ride to Ultra (besides slightly heavier)?

4) Never Summer Raptor 159 or 164 (maybe 161W?). GOOD: Damp, fast, excellent edge-to-edge, easy to ride. BAD?: Canít think of muchÖ.. limited comparative mixed reviews from crotchety powder snobs used to longboard Priors and Tankers?? [haha absolutely no offense intended to anyone riding one], comparative ride to Premier F1 or Summit?

5) Nidecker Legend 164. GOOD: See previous Nideckers. BAD?: Too stiff?, no camrock??, where do I get one?

6) ????

Close calls, but not under consideration:

Rossignol Experience (full-mag, Flagship has stiffer nose with similar shape), Arbor A-Frame (dig the design, but wanna shy away from full camber for a change), Salomon Burner (ditto), Bataleon Undisputed (ditto), Lib/Gnu boards (full-mag, though my friends swear by their TRS and T.Rice), Rome Notch (fairly tapered, more geared towards straight pow), Capita Charlie Slasher (ditto), Burton Malalo (ditto, no EST binding plates), Ride Slackcountry (want some level of camber, price is spendy; but in the same breath, Iím considering Nidecker), YES Optimistic (very likely an excellent all-around board, though looking for something more specialized so that I donít retire the Omen), Capita BSOD (ditto), Nidecker Platinum (more BX than freeride), Elan Vertigo (ditto), Venture (flat profile between bindings, definitely looking for the pop of camber in a hybrid profile with rocker for float), Bataleon Enemy +++ (just like Nidecker, is the pricetag justified? Isnít it more of a Ďdo everything awesomeí board than a purpose-built big-mountain gun? is TBT an advantage or hindrance for aggressive hardpack carving?)

Any rationale based on first-hand riding experience or similar boards is most helpful. I am most interested in detailed comparative perspectives and factors that I am overlooking above all else. I want the total ride that will be the heavy munitions of my arsenal for years (unless I miraculously start dropping remote heli runs in AK or upper BC regularly). Graphics and gimmicks be damned.

I need the board that Lemmy would ride if he wasnít preoccupied making peopleís heads explode with a Rickenbacker.

Thanks for your help!
Cloudminder is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 36 (permalink) Old 09-04-2011, 12:52 AM
Veteran Member
Nivek's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Mordor
Posts: 8,136
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 400 Post(s)
I'd probably for for a Raptor of you choices so far. The Other two I have any experience with are the Ride Highlife UL and the Salomon Mans board. Both very burly boards.

Snowboarding Is...

That thing I do to escape the world and have fun with my friends
Nivek is offline  
post #3 of 36 (permalink) Old 09-04-2011, 09:25 AM
Veteran Member
walove's Avatar
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Bozeman/Seattle
Posts: 767
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Smokin kt22, modified mag directional freeride
Gnu billygoat mellowest mag from mervin

From your list, I would say flagship then raptor

walove is offline  
post #4 of 36 (permalink) Old 09-04-2011, 09:46 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 454
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
How bout the Ride Berzerker? Jake Blauvelt's shred stick
skip11 is offline  
post #5 of 36 (permalink) Old 09-15-2011, 01:25 AM Thread Starter
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hey Nivek,

The more and more I look around, the better the Highlife UL is looking. How would you suppose the Raptor will ride in comparison? Man's Board looks solid too. How's the ride compare to the Highlife?

Between the Berzerker and Highlife, I'm leaning towards the Highlife due to the deeper sidecut on the Berzerker. The Omen is already extra surfy/slashy, so I'm after more of a straight-line monster that I can push the throttle to eleven on. Moreover, I want to have a ride different enough from my all-mountain board that there's no selection ambiguity based on what conditions I'm riding; camrock/s-rocker being one aspect and length/sidecut being the other mainly.

KT-22 i'll definitely be checking demo tents for. As a side-note, I had some of the best deep powder runs of my life off that lift last winter. Like, beyond-stellar-enough-to-justify-buying-a-badassed-freeride-setup-this-season good

Any Nidecker riders out there?
Cloudminder is offline  
post #6 of 36 (permalink) Old 09-15-2011, 02:13 AM
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sweden
Posts: 24
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I ride a Jones Flagship and you would not be dissapointed with it. This board is superfast and stable, both on and off piste. The rockered nose is awesome, a lot of times i have felt certain that my nose dug down too deep and that i will fall just to se that the moment after my nose pops up from the snow and i am flying down the slope again.

Superfast on groomers and really stable even when it gets tracked out.
Hellude is offline  
post #7 of 36 (permalink) Old 09-15-2011, 03:29 AM
snowklinger's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: L-Town
Posts: 7,371
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 469 Post(s)
get the raptor! look at the technology and the blood sweat and tears. these boards are handmade in the usa! look at all the features of the raptor on their website! you are gettting to the point where you are splitting hairs between peoples opinions between a bunch of similar boards. on the one hand, every one of these boards would probably make you happy. on the other, whoose opinion REALLY matters? you have done alot of research already, i noticed in your original post you had nothing bad to say about it(the raptor).

disclaimer: been riding for a long time but started only seriously last year... since then it turns out i have alot of friends and connections through work who are involved with never summer and icelantic (a SICK ski company that presses their products at the NS factory) from ownership to team riders. got the wrong gear last year but needless to say i'm gonna rectify that this season with the proto ct. just puttin it out there for the local boys...nobody stopping you buying from taiwan but just LOOK at the product!
snowklinger is offline  
post #8 of 36 (permalink) Old 09-20-2011, 11:44 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Okay. More decision clarity has struck me. The Raptor has rocker between the bindings like Libís C2BTX or Burtonís V-Rocker. I like riding more setback and using my back leg to power out of turns, thus having the boardís pivot-point more centered isnít ideal unless Iím looking for a 100% dedicated pow board (which Iím not; even then Iíd probably still go rocker/flat or S and tapered). Consequently, S-rocker or Ďmustacheí rocker it is.

Thus itís now a shoot-out between the Flagship and the Highlife UL. FIGHT!

Unless someone can convince me otherwise, I am leaning towards the Flagship slightly based on the ability to push it harder, my riding preferences, and given the fact that I have a fun/playful all-mountain board already. My only concern is whether it will behave if Iím not charging (which I think the HL will) if Iím riding with folks who end up being less adventurous. Iím assuming the HL is damper and softer than the Flagship, which could either be a good thing or a bad thing dependent on how you look at it.

Moreover, Iím torn between a 161 or 164. I know I can handle a 161, though Iím wondering if the 164 will eat me alive in anything except powder. Iím in the upper end of the weight bracket with all my gear for a 161, but on the lower end for a 164. The fact that a S-rocker board should ride shorter than reality is making me lean towards the 164, butÖÖÖÖ
Cloudminder is offline  
post #9 of 36 (permalink) Old 09-21-2011, 12:11 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 202
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
I thought raptor has a setback
ckang008 is offline  
post #10 of 36 (permalink) Old 09-21-2011, 12:14 AM
Senior Member
CMSbored's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Laramie, WYO
Posts: 457
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
look at the Never Summer Premier F1. just a suggestion
CMSbored is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome