![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 14
|
Hey,
my foot size is US 11. The available sizes for the board are 154 and 158. Im thinking of pulling the trigger on 158, my two concerns are the difference in flex and I read somewhere the Rook feels bigger for its size... |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,784
|
Truth is you would be best off on the 156. I am 185 as well (larger feet though) and have had some great days on that deck. You can easily ride either the 154 or 158, but considering what the Rook is designed for (soft flex, true twin, flat profile) going longer on this one does not make sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 14
|
Quote:
thanx for the help! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,784
|
Quote:
Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 14
|
Quote:
![]() Definitely bombing down groomers - 35%, buttering and finding things outside the park to trick on - 20% and shredding powder - 5%... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,784
|
You can have a lot of fun on the Rook for that kind of play riding. It is a pretty soft true twin so there would be better boards for you for groomers but as a whole the 158 will be an OK balance for what you are describing.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|