![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 122
|
Yeah I can. Checked it out at the store the other day. Id say its at least half the weight and I had both boards at my disposal for the lift test its pretty crazy, I don't have exact weights though, but its definitely very noticeable . I'm thinking its because of the thinned out tips.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,784
|
We were lifting dozens of these into overhead racks last week and when we got up to the 158's we were busting up at how light they were. Not sure what they did this year to get that dramatic of a change (the spec is very similar), but yeah, it is noticable and it is not limited to the Rook (the Magnum is a huge wide model and is also unbelievably light for its proportions) . I spent a magic day on the new Rook 156 at T-line this summer. If you like like flat, this is a must-demo board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: fuck boulder
Posts: 2,834
|
just going on what people have said on this forum, the proto is said to be suprisingly light. pretty sure the t. rice on the other hand is relatively heavy. supposedly that '12 rook is pretty light too.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|