![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 160
|
Help me pick out a new board. I narrowed it down to a few already but still not sure which one would be the best for me. I am 5’11” tall and weight about 195. I ride mostly in the Midwest, which is usually manmade snow, groomed, and it can get pretty icy, almost never powder. I never do park, but I am starting to do small jumps and would like to progress in that area. I would consider myself an intermediate rider. Currently, I ride a 2006/2007 Burton Clash 160 and I think its time to get a more advance/better board. This is my 2nd board. I do not need a wide board. My top choice right now is Never Summer Heritage 158, but also these in no particular order:
• Ride Berzerker 158 • Ride Antic 157 • Lib-Tech Attack Banana • Lib-Tech LaNina MC • Lib-Tech Travis Rice Pro 157 • Lib-tech TRS 157 • GNU Dirty Pillow 159 |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 95
|
Endeavor Boards - I road one last year pretty good. And Thryll.com has them 1/2 off right now. Here's an invite code to join. I just got one of those extreme pogo sticks suckkkaaaaa - 10ft in the air
http://thryll.com/index.php/referafr...B0aHJ5bGwuY29t |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 432
|
Quote:
For your riding conditions, riding style, and riding level, I would recommend the TRS. I think you will have a ton of fun on it, and out of all of those I think it has the most MTX. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 160
|
I read up more on the TRS and it looks to be a great board. What would be a good size? I'm thinking either 157 or 159. I felt with the clash 160, it was hard to control at slow speed (might be the board also) and it took a lot of effort to throw from side to side on very steep slopes, that is why I am considering the 157 but also at the same time I do not want to lose the stability of a longer board while going fast.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: GA
Posts: 430
|
IMO, go with the 157 or even down to a 154-155 if they have that in the board you are looking at...i am 6 foot and 210 lbs and i ride a 156/157 and in no way feel its too short...might even drop down in size if i get a park only board
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|