Help me pick a size - Proto CT - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 8 (permalink) Old 10-26-2011, 10:11 PM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 45
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Help me pick a size - Proto CT

Another what size to get thread..... I've picked out my board (Proto CT), boots and bindings, just need to pick the size. I'm between 6' and 6'1" and 170-175lbs with a 10.5 boot. I ride pretty much everything (probably 30% park, 35% groomed, hard pack, soft pack and 35% all mountain terrain including powder, trees, etc). Some of my buddies and wife included are not very good so I do fine myself playing around on the flatter runs (buttering and such) so I want something playful and fun, but can still handle the bigger stuff when I head out with my other group of buddies. I am having a hard time deciding between the 154 and 157 CT. I like the idea of a shorter board since it still has a long effective edge for trees, buttering and the park, but not sure how the 154 would handle the bigger stuff and powder. Would the 154 be too unstable? Anybody in the same boat that can offer their 2 cents? I ride a 158 cambered board now and its great for freeriding and bombing the groomers, but its not very fun at all in the park or for buttering around (probably cause it is very stiff). It is great in the pipe though, albeit a bit unforgiving. Also with the blunted tips and longer effective edge on the Proto, are you supposed to size down?
sdbadd is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 8 (permalink) Old 10-26-2011, 10:24 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 229
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Pick the 157. It will ride like a 154. You will get away with riding all mountain at this size board, given your weight height ratio. If your more powder orientated, maybe think about the 160
JVee is offline  
post #3 of 8 (permalink) Old 10-27-2011, 07:57 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JVee View Post
Pick the 157. It will ride like a 154. You will get away with riding all mountain at this size board, given your weight height ratio. If your more powder orientated, maybe think about the 160
From what I've read the proto rides longer than its actual size. I.e the 154 would ride like a 157 etc, not the other way around.
Tr81006 is offline  
post #4 of 8 (permalink) Old 10-27-2011, 08:37 AM
Resident Snowman
 
aiidoneus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 608
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
5'10", 150, with 10-10.5 boots. I ride a 154, I think 157 may be a bit better for your weight.
aiidoneus is offline  
post #5 of 8 (permalink) Old 10-27-2011, 09:29 AM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
ecks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: NYC
Posts: 413
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tr81006 View Post
From what I've read the proto rides longer than its actual size. I.e the 154 would ride like a 157 etc, not the other way around.
Yep this is correct. I had a 157 proto and laid it against the wall with my 160 heritage on top and they had the exact same effective edge.

For your case it is really on your preference, I think your right in the middle of the two sizes. I'm 6'1' and 195 pounds and I went to a 157 and it was playful enough and just stable enough when bombing it downhill. Your going to have a hard time finding someone exactly your size and weight but between me and aiidoneus it should give you a good idea where you fit in.
ecks is offline  
post #6 of 8 (permalink) Old 10-27-2011, 12:25 PM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 45
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks guys. I'm guessing the 157 would best for me. The 154 has the same effective edge as my current 158 cambered board so I think I could get away with the smaller board, but in the end I'm guessing the 157 would be the most stable and still playful.
sdbadd is offline  
post #7 of 8 (permalink) Old 10-27-2011, 09:43 PM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 45
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I found this size chart for the 2012 Never Summer boards. Just a rough guideline but it seems a bit odd as it lists my weight as the max recommended for the 157. I'm guessing this chart is done up by evo though and not by NS.

Never Summer Snowboard Size Chart - 2012 | evo
sdbadd is offline  
post #8 of 8 (permalink) Old 10-27-2011, 10:12 PM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
david_z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Detroit suburbs
Posts: 3,744
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Blog Entries: 6
a 154 will ride like a 157 (not the other way around, like someone mentioned above). You really could go either way. I go 210 pounds and I'd split between the 160 and the 157, depending on what I wanted to ride.
david_z is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome