NS Raptor 164 and 165 lbs - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
SnowboardingForum.com is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-17-2011, 01:13 PM   #1 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Central Europe
Posts: 6
Default NS Raptor 164 and 165 lbs

Hello guys!

Firstly a little bit about me: I've been riding since 2001 and I've tried about 20-30 boards so far. Generally I love to do deep-carved turns and ride by leaps and bounds. There's only one reason why I didn't direct myself to hardstuff - it's a passion to be on a board in a couloir, so roughly speaking it's a passion for broadly defined freeriding. Notwithstanding groomy days predominate over pow days, let's say: 3 days on groomers and then 1 day of off-piste.
I'm 6 ft and weigh 165 lbs.

The problem: after lots of time of thinking I decided to purchase NS Raptor 164. And yes, I know.. I bought a pig in a poke; because, even, by mischance I hadn't tested the board last year!

The question: how the board would behave under my weight in my style of riding? Generally I ask about the carving, fast turns, issues of centre of gravity (will it be essential to lower it in comparison to 159cm?), etc.
Let's just skip the part of powder riding, because I guess there's no much talk about it.

I'll be really grateful for Your help,
cheers,
Kita.
Kita is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 11-17-2011, 01:52 PM   #2 (permalink)
Banned
 
Sick-Pow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,314
Default

That board will be AWESOME for everything you ride.....even POW!!!
Sick-Pow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2011, 01:57 PM   #3 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
linvillegorge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Evergreen, CO
Posts: 6,444
Default

Yeah, the trend in snowboarding is toward smaller and smaller, but for your riding style I don't see a problem here. It's definitely big, but if you like to ride balls to the wall and a lot of powder, then go for it.

As for carving, it'll be awesome.

Fast turns? Not sure what you're talking about here. If you're talking about big sweeping turns going balls to the wall, then again, it'll be awesome. If you talking about being nimble in the trees, well, it's a big ass board. The RC profile will help here, but it's still a big ass board. You're gonna have to muscle it around a bit.

Center of gravity? It's not going to make a bit of difference. The weight difference between a 159 and 164 is going to be negligible in terms of COG.
__________________
"People say that marijuana smoking is going to get in the way of my career. I say to them that on the contrary, my fighting career is getting in the way of my marijuana smoking." -Nick Diaz
linvillegorge is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2011, 04:22 PM   #4 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
Milo303's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Denver
Posts: 2,954
Default

I ride oversized boards for my weight also.

If you're not a park rat, a larger board doesn't hurt.... You adapt and throw it around the same as people with shorter boards. But on the pow days, you get to ride the same board with less effort.
__________________
"When I do good, I feel good; when I do bad, I feel bad. Thatís my religion." - Abraham Lincoln
Quote:
Originally Posted by sedition View Post
Moral of the story: If your going to rob people, wear a diaper.
Milo303 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2011, 02:39 PM   #5 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Central Europe
Posts: 6
Default

Uff.., You calmed me down. I see there's nothing to worry about.
No, no, no, I'm absolutely not a park rat.

But let me dig a bit more..
Hipothetically if I had two Raptors (a 159 and 164 like above), which one would have better edge hold in terms of carving or even in terms of carving resembling extremecarving (at least in theory)?
Keeping my weight (165 lbs) in mind: a 164 has a longer effective edge, but on the other hand during a really sweeping turn my centre of gravity is far away from the board which makes the edge of 164 more unweighted comparing to the same situation on 159. And then come the other asepcts like centrifugal force for example. Which would be more stable? A difference would be noticeable?

Hell! I just read what I had written and realised it'll be hard to answer me, besides testing both boards by myself (what doesn't seem to happen soon).

Thanks - You're good guys, You're truly helpful!
Kita is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2011, 02:55 PM   #6 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
linvillegorge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Evergreen, CO
Posts: 6,444
Default

The 164. Alpine carving boards are routinely 10+ cm larger than what most people typically ride.

You gotta remember, the faster you're going and the harder you're carving, the more force you're going to be exerting. Your 165 pound body is going to be exerting a lot more force than that in a high speed carve.
__________________
"People say that marijuana smoking is going to get in the way of my career. I say to them that on the contrary, my fighting career is getting in the way of my marijuana smoking." -Nick Diaz
linvillegorge is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:51 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums