2012 Never Summer SL...not as fun as my Slayblade - Page 3 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
SnowboardingForum.com is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-23-2011, 02:53 PM   #21 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 65
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hikeswithdogs View Post
Would be curious to get more experienced opinions but I would assume a reg camber or Flat\0 camber is always going to be better for flat base riding than anything reverse camber.
What I noticed immediately about the zero camber of the Slayblade compared with the SL was the increased stability that the board offered since it had full-contact with the snow. Compared to my old cambered board, it was a night and day difference w/r/t higher-speed flat-basing. The negative issues I've read about the zero camber profile was that there was a tendency of the board to get "sucked-into" the snow in heavy/wet snow conditions due to the full contact (which I've never experienced mainly because I ride in CO and UT mostly).
GeoFX is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 12-23-2011, 03:27 PM   #22 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 410
Default

I usually demo 1-2 days, depending on how much I like it. Rode the Heritage for 2 days. Rode the SL for a day. Rode the Lynn for a day, then rode the T Rice the second day.

Usually I go a whole day, because you need to adjust to the board. A couple runs IMO is worthless. You need it at least a day.
Nolefan2011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2011, 05:05 PM   #23 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
lonerider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 947
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by P3 Mammoth View Post
You have to buy the right size board to do a proper evaluation! With your height and foot size, you should be on a 153. There is a significant difference in waist width between a 153 and 155.This difference is what accounts for your lack of nimbleness in turn initiation and edge to edge response. I am your size and have ridden both lengths.
Footsize is a consideration... he could definitely go with a narrower board. But according to the specs, his old K2 Slayblade 153 was 24.8 cm waist and 29.2 cm tips compared to a 25.0 cm and 29.5 tips for the SL 155. That's only 3 mm and I'm pretty sure the few people would notice much of a difference in that. To give you an idea, I have ridden boards that have 18 cm waists (that is a noticeable change in edge to edge response).



I have also test ridden the 2012 SL 153 and 155 (I own the 2009 SL 155) and I don't think the would 153 be stable enough for him (I'm like 15 lbs lighter than the both of you and fine the 155 pretty easy to turn), but who knows...

Quote:
Originally Posted by P3 Mammoth View Post
The NS SL does not shine in icy conditions. If you ride firm snow most of the time, a hybrid camber board or a Mervin C2 Btx board might be a better fit. Look for a board that has a waist width less than 25.0. You'll be a much happy camper.
The SL is a hybrid camber board... in fact the Mervin's C2BTX is arguably either a copy... or a refined version of NS's RC tech (Mervin came out with it a year after NS, replacing their first generation BTX). Now I'm becoming more and more interested in trying out the C2BTX... (the 1st gen BTX left just left a bad taste in my mouth)

Video of me messing around on the NS SL155 on a mellow slope.



Another video, at 0:45 you can see me flat-boarding quite a bit down a slope to hit a 40-foot kicker. That's the same jump you see at the start of the video (my friends are lazy and it's hard for me to get them to film me).


Last edited by lonerider; 12-23-2011 at 05:14 PM.
lonerider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2011, 05:12 PM   #24 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
lonerider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 947
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nolefan2011 View Post
I'll back you up Geo. I have demoed a lot of stuff. A LOT. I could offer a lot better options than the SL. The SL failed for me. The Evo and Heritage were much better in their respective categories.

I doubt I ever own a Never Summer. Just seems to me, if you are avoiding the one board quiver option, there are boards that are better in each category.

The SL is a damp, I thought stable board (I have ridden a lot of RC type boards). However, it is so plank like, that it just doesn't have the fun and snap of other boards in their category. Plain and simple, unless you are a beginner, ride the SL and then ride the Coda from Arbor. Tell me which board you liked better without lying. I think newer riders love the SL because it is definitely more damp and stable at speed than the Coda. But the Coda has way more response edge to edge, the grip tech is better edge technology, and the snap and pop is on another planet compared to the SL. But for a beginner to advanced beginner borderlining on intermediate, I get it. For good enough riders, the little extra chatter at speed doesn't bother you.

If you want a quiver killer, the SL is great. Damp and stable to make ANYONE comfortable bombing. But if you are willing to buy a couple boards, get something that is excellent in certain categories, and weaker in other categories, and become a better rider so that issues of dampness and stability mean less to you because that little extra chatter when bombing no longer scares you.

Even as a one board quiver killer, I can think of boards right now that are better than the SL. The Arbor Coda, the Lib Tech TRS, the Forum Double Dog Destroyer (fun board, little dampness, and edge hold is weaker, but the snap and responsiveness are worth it if you can ride well), K2 Turbo Dream, Ride Machete, the list goes on.....
Thanks for the info. I will have to try out the Arbor Coda (and the Westmark) when I get a chance. For 2012 - I rode the Evo, Proto CT and SL... and ended up liking the Proto CT the best.
lonerider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2011, 05:19 PM   #25 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
lonerider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 947
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoFX View Post
I was wondering about the waist width when first researching the SL and based on Snowolf's review of the 158 Heritage (with a waist width of 25.4cm and his size 8.5 feet). I asked him if he thought the the board was too wide and he replied that the ultra-responsiveness of the camber sections in the RC tech was well suited for smaller-footed riders even at those widths. The SL has a 25.2cm waist width (for comparison, my Slayblade 153 has a 24.8cm ww). Other reviews of the NS men's boards (by Shayboarder who has smaller feet than myself) never mentioned the WW being an issue.

Another reason for going to a 155 board (and thus wider width) is that I generally ride in big-mountain resorts with more pow so that should be better than the 153 with respect to floatability.
2012 SL 155, is 25.1 cm waist... so you are only 1 mm off, off course 25.1 - 24.8 is only a 3 mm difference (meaning the white part of your finger nail is more than that). Seriously, in this particular instance I don't think that is the issue.
lonerider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2011, 06:02 PM   #26 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nolefan2011 View Post

Usually I go a whole day, because you need to adjust to the board. A couple runs IMO is worthless. You need it at least a day.
word. I feel the same way.
idshred is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:49 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums