![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 61
|
Currently I have a 2011 Lib Tech T. Rice. I got this board just before I went on a trip to Jackson Hole last year and really like it, but I've been thinking I might be happier with a more playful board.
My riding style is mostly groomers but I want to get more involved in butters, rails, and boxes. I've been reading a lot of posts on the NS Evo and Proto, and I'm really confused what board to go with. Will both of those boards be good on groomers and especially ice (most of my riding will be done in Michigan but hope to get out west once a year)? Or do I just break down and buy a jib specific board? Information Overload! Please help! |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sandpoint / Moscow, ID
Posts: 2,301
|
Neversummer's RC tech makes all of their boards (even the Evo, which is essentially their jib-board) handle ice and groomers with flying colors. Due to the increased flex on the Evo especially though, it will not handle chewed up terrain very well. I ride an 09/10 Evo which is stiffer then the current models, and it handles the whole mountain really well for still having a fairly significant flex.
If you want something that will kill groomers but still be fun to throw around, I'd probably go with the Proto. On a side note, while NS's vario grip works pretty well, I think Lib Tech's magnetraction is a little more grippy on ice.
__________________
PowderHound and TreeNinja |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,752
|
Quote:
I'm 175lbs and it's a 158. Depends on what you want out of a board though. That said, two board quiver if you can afford it |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | ||
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sandpoint / Moscow, ID
Posts: 2,301
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
PowderHound and TreeNinja |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,752
|
Probably, but whatever really... I don't hit rails or boxes, just jumps, side hits and natural jibs (at least i'm working my way up to 'successfully hitting natural jibs
)Quote:
To help out the OP, obviously the Evo leans more towards park, the proto more towards shredding the whole mountain including park... someone correct me if that's not totally accurate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 689
|
I have 2 boards... a NS Proto CTX and a Lib T. Rice HP... with your riding style, I wouldn't hesitate to buy the Proto. It is lighter, easier to spin and more comfortable on jibs (although I only know from riding boxes). It can't rip as fast as the T. RIce, which you can get up to Mach 7 on... but the Proto is still a really fast board, great for groomers, medium jumps and jibbing. I would definitely go Proto...
Note: I'm 6'3", 180, size 11 boot; and I ride the 158 wide Proto and the 161.5 T. Rice HP... maxed out stances on both My only regret: getting the wide Proto... the wideness makes it harder to get edge to edge.... I wish I went with the regular Last edited by BigmountainVMD; 01-18-2012 at 12:23 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 61
|
Thanks everyone, I really appreciate all the feedback.
At 5'11", 195, size 10 boot, do you think I should go with a Proto 154 or 157? I'm going to be in Snowmass in a couple weeks, so I'm hoping I might be able to find one to demo. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,752
|
Quote:
If you are gonna keep it and use proto mainly for park then go shorter. If you want something to 'replace' the T-Rice then go longer so you can bomb bigger stuff as well as park on it |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|