Question about directional, twin, and directional twin - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 9 (permalink) Old 01-19-2012, 03:39 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Question about directional, twin, and directional twin

Hey,

In the past I have rode a directional and a twin. I understand the difference between these boards, is the way the holes are setup. I know twin's are in the middle and the board has an even distance from the binding holes to the tip. Directional is set back a little bit.

What exactly are these new like directional twins? Are the holes drilled like a twin(even distance to tips) but the board is designed more like a directional to be rode one way?

As well with my gnu park pickle(twin), I have been setting the bindings back a hole on powder days. I found this helped it ride better in powder. I've left it like that and tried riding directional on groomers now. I found that I enjoy being further back on the board more then in the middle. What is the difference with riding a twin setback, and a true directional? Is there much difference in the board design? For example I'm looking for a directional board to buy, and I've found a twin that I really like. Could I use the twin and set my stance back, or would it make more sense to buy a true directional!

Thanks!
Bobby Budds is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 9 (permalink) Old 01-19-2012, 03:57 PM
d15
Senior Member
 
d15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 216
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Directional:
Sometimes the tail width is narrower than nose width (a.k.a. tapered).
The nose is typically longer than tail.
The sidecuts are directional.
Inserts are sometimes setback.

Pure Twin (a.k.a. true twin):
Everything from the nose & tail length, nose & tail width, and sidecuts are all exactly the same whether you face backwards or forwards.

Twin Like (a.k.a almost twin, or directional twin):
The sidecuts are the same, but the nose length is slightly longer than tail. This is usually so that the board can ride a little better over crud or pow. They're also setback by a small amount.
Also, by directional sometimes they're referring to the core, such as how the tail part is snappier/poppier/stiffer than the front.

Asymetrical Twin:
Everything is twin, except the heelside sidecut is a little deeper than the toeside for easier heelside initiation.

Last edited by d15; 01-19-2012 at 06:42 PM.
d15 is offline  
post #3 of 9 (permalink) Old 01-19-2012, 03:58 PM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
david_z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Detroit suburbs
Posts: 3,685
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Blog Entries: 6
You got it figured out pretty much. typically a directional board might have a slightly tapered shape to it so a different sidecut, making the tail narrower than the nose. It may also have a different flex for nose/tail, stiffer in the tail. A directional twin would be like a twin shape with most likely a small setback so it's gonna be easier to ride your forwards stance than to ride switch. With the advent of rocker/reverse camber, the directional shape is no longer as important for instance, for riding pow, because the rocker assists with float and relieves stress on the back leg, etc., which the original D-shape & setback was supposed to help with.

agnarchy.com >> Reviews | Trip Reports | Commentary



"Maybe you never thought about hiking the hills just outside of town. But maybe you should."
david_z is offline  
post #4 of 9 (permalink) Old 01-19-2012, 04:02 PM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 510
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by david_z View Post
You got it figured out pretty much. typically a directional board might have a slightly tapered shape to it so a different sidecut, making the tail narrower than the nose. It may also have a different flex for nose/tail, stiffer in the tail. A directional twin would be like a twin shape with most likely a small setback so it's gonna be easier to ride your forwards stance than to ride switch. With the advent of rocker/reverse camber, the directional shape is no longer as important for instance, for riding pow, because the rocker assists with float and relieves stress on the back leg, etc., which the original D-shape & setback was supposed to help with.
Also, to make things more confusing, some boards called directional twins, will be twin in shape, but have a directional flex, commonly the tail is stiffer than the nose.
phony_stark is offline  
post #5 of 9 (permalink) Old 01-19-2012, 08:28 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby Budds View Post

If I'm looking for a directional board to buy, and I've found a twin that I really like. Could I use the twin and set my stance back, or would it make more sense to buy a true directional!

Thanks!
Thanks for the info. Does anyone have anything to say about the quote from myself overhead?
Bobby Budds is offline  
post #6 of 9 (permalink) Old 01-19-2012, 08:32 PM
d15
Senior Member
 
d15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 216
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Setting back on a true twin board makes the geometry retarded. You're better off getting a directional/almost twin that's already set back a little.
d15 is offline  
post #7 of 9 (permalink) Old 01-19-2012, 10:57 PM
Veteran Member
 
dreampow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Kyoto Japan
Posts: 1,231
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby Budds View Post
Thanks for the info. Does anyone have anything to say about the quote from myself overhead?
I have ridden twin boards with a setback when the pow gets too deep. Not a problem, but I would only do this for pow now for freeride as the sidecut and flex will not be optimal.
dreampow is offline  
post #8 of 9 (permalink) Old 01-20-2012, 01:14 AM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Zombaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: CA
Posts: 175
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by d15 View Post
Asymetrical Twin:
Everything is twin, except the heelside sidecut is a little deeper than the toeside for easier heelside initiation.
Question on this design: I'm assuming the nose and tail are the same size and the same distance from the binding holes? With the deeper heelside sidecut, when mounting bindings for goofy- my nose of the board would be the tail for regular riders? Essentially goofy and regular bindings will be mounted in the same direction?
Zombaco is offline  
post #9 of 9 (permalink) Old 01-20-2012, 02:53 AM
d15
Senior Member
 
d15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 216
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zombaco View Post
Question on this design: I'm assuming the nose and tail are the same size and the same distance from the binding holes? With the deeper heelside sidecut, when mounting bindings for goofy- my nose of the board would be the tail for regular riders? Essentially goofy and regular bindings will be mounted in the same direction?
Yes exactly as you mentioned. The company should make an indicator (such as on the graphics) telling you which side should always be your heelside. The Gnu Pickle does this.

Notice on the left edge of the topsheet, there're arrows telling you heelside should always be there regardless of your stance direction.
d15 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome