Board Confusion: 6'4" 215lbs Size 12 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 22 (permalink) Old 03-11-2008, 09:42 PM
hawk45
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Board Confusion: 6'4" 215lbs Size 12

Hi all.. .yep, I'm a noob. I've been reading tread after thread and getting more confused.

I'm 6'4" 215lbs Size 12 boot. I plan to do all mountain riding .. no park.

So am I looking for a wide board in the 160's? I want something decent but not highend.. something I can grow with.

I can cover the boots and binds on my own..

Thanks for the help.

Hawk
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 22 (permalink) Old 03-11-2008, 09:55 PM
Trace63
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Rome Flag 163 or 168cm

or ever a Rome Manual
post #3 of 22 (permalink) Old 03-11-2008, 10:12 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 29
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
if ur a noob you should go for a shorter board so u can learn faster, i'd say 160
nyckk is offline  
post #4 of 22 (permalink) Old 03-11-2008, 10:22 PM
hawk45
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Would a 160 be the absolute minimum? And will a wide board make it harder to turn/stop?
post #5 of 22 (permalink) Old 03-11-2008, 10:27 PM
Trace63
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
160 would be pushing from what Ive read. Wait for a more experienced opinion but I doubt that size would be good for you. When I checked around for mine, at 6'4 and 220lb the average size I was told to get was a 165+. So I found a Rome Flag 168 for 300 and snatched it. A 160 would be really minimum I would guess and would give you a more park ride rather than an all mountain.
post #6 of 22 (permalink) Old 03-12-2008, 09:09 AM
hawk45
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Good deal.. I'll wait for more responses.

Also, is a twin directional better? Does it make you a better rider to be able to ride normal and goofy?
post #7 of 22 (permalink) Old 03-12-2008, 09:42 AM
Samyaksambuddhas
 
PaoloSmythe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Only British blaady Columbia!!!
Posts: 4,622
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
i weigh 95kg which i think is more or less the same as you.

when i learnt to ride, it was on a 154 sized board. after a while of riding, i stepped up to a 160 if i recall correctly and the difference was notably significant. the bigger board altho feeling like it needed more effort to turn, was far more stable and on the whole, 'felt like a much better fit'.

the smaller boards are more 'twitchy'. this can be good for newbs, as they are easier to initiate and realise turns. however, this is a double edged sword and the small plank might tend to 'turn' when you don't want it to, aka you catch an edge.

having said this, going too small when learning is not necessarily a bad thing.... but if you want 'something to grow into' and / or if as i suspect, you are looking forward to going off piste to carve up the fresh, instead of hitting the park kickers, a longer board would suit you better.

my learner board sucked balls on fresh snow, and the need to maintain optimal speed was destracting from the enjoyment itself. the longer board might 'seem' tougher to turn, but that was only a comparative problem i personally encountered.

if i were you, i would look for a soft flexing (ie intermediate) board of the correct length... for your weight (height is irrelevent, but foot size is an issue that might need a 'wide' board) i reckon a 162 +/- 2 or 3cm would work well.

Just coz you don't understand it
Doesn't mean it makes no sense!
PaoloSmythe is offline  
post #8 of 22 (permalink) Old 03-12-2008, 09:48 AM
hawk45
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Excellent.. thanks for your feedback Paolo.
post #9 of 22 (permalink) Old 03-12-2008, 10:01 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 232
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Paolo's spot on.

Do you know what kind of riding you want to do? If you like more freestyle riding, and playing around with jumps, spins, and presses, you'll like a shorter board (160-162 maybe). If you like just straight freeride, you want something a little longer (163-165). And for a powder board, look in the upper 160s.

Those numbers are just ballparks. Keep in mind every board has it's own personality.
scottland is offline  
post #10 of 22 (permalink) Old 03-12-2008, 10:18 AM
hawk45
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
I'm old (35 yrs) so no park stuff for me (jumps/rails/etc). I just want to carve up the mtn.
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome