Should I Buy a TRice 161.5 or 164.5? - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 8 (permalink) Old 02-06-2012, 10:35 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 257
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Should I Buy a TRice 161.5 or 164.5?

I'm 6'2 and anywhere between 200-210 pounds depending as I hit the weights from time to time. I am an intermediate rider, mostly like to cruise and hit some jumps, not much jibbing. I'm an east coast rider if that matters at all.

My size kinda tells me I should go 164.5, but someone offered me a sweet deal on a 161.5. At the end of the day I just want to buy the best board for me, but obviously saving money is always nice. With that being said, what size should I get and is there much of a difference?

161.5 offered is also a HP model which I would basically get for the regular price.
kdirt is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 8 (permalink) Old 02-06-2012, 11:18 PM
Veteran Member
 
cjcameron11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 778
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Go the 161.5 I had the 164.5 and I'm way bigger than you and it handled fine, I reckon you will be fine at the shorter length

my names's Petey and i have gigantic balls
cjcameron11 is offline  
post #3 of 8 (permalink) Old 02-07-2012, 06:17 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 257
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Good to know, I know T.Rice himself rides a 161.5 and he's like 5'10 and 175 or so, so it had me thinking.
kdirt is offline  
post #4 of 8 (permalink) Old 02-07-2012, 06:52 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 58
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Im about the same weight/height as you and ride the 161.5. I feel as though its perfect.
dantech is offline  
post #5 of 8 (permalink) Old 02-07-2012, 08:13 AM
Senior Member
 
huckfin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: pacific nw
Posts: 144
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
just because you saw 161.5 on his board in art of flight when he is riding in neck deep pow does not mean that a 161.5 is the board every guy his size should choose to ride.. the t.rice rides very very long, just look at the eff edge and sidecut compared to other boards. don't chose your board size based on what you've watched a pro ride in the back country, unless you have a heli and plan to ride neck deep pow every time you hit the slopes? just a thought. on hybrid camber boards my suggestion would be to go as short as you can.. they float fine in the pow at any length, the big difference is in the eff edge and the sidecut, and when you get up into some sketchy terrain or some chutes, that 164 t.rice will feel like it's a 180.

Last edited by huckfin; 02-07-2012 at 08:15 AM.
huckfin is offline  
post #6 of 8 (permalink) Old 02-07-2012, 09:06 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 257
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by huckfin View Post
just because you saw 161.5 on his board in art of flight when he is riding in neck deep pow does not mean that a 161.5 is the board every guy his size should choose to ride.. the t.rice rides very very long, just look at the eff edge and sidecut compared to other boards. don't chose your board size based on what you've watched a pro ride in the back country, unless you have a heli and plan to ride neck deep pow every time you hit the slopes? just a thought. on hybrid camber boards my suggestion would be to go as short as you can.. they float fine in the pow at any length, the big difference is in the eff edge and the sidecut, and when you get up into some sketchy terrain or some chutes, that 164 t.rice will feel like it's a 180.
Yeah this pretty much sums it up, glad you posted this, thanks. I was over thinking it. Riding a 159 banana now, feels okay, but a slight up in length should be be fine at 161.5.
kdirt is offline  
post #7 of 8 (permalink) Old 02-07-2012, 01:12 PM
Veteran Member
 
schmitty34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Probably at work wasting time
Posts: 889
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
161.5 for sure.

I'm 6'4'' 210 and ride it in powder on the west coast and the size is fine. I had it in tits deep powder earlier this year and it floated pretty well.

164 for the east coast with limited powder would be overkill IMO...unleass you ureally just want a fast hard charging carver and not worried how playful it is.
schmitty34 is offline  
post #8 of 8 (permalink) Old 02-07-2012, 01:26 PM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 785
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by schmitty34 View Post
161.5 for sure.

I'm 6'4'' 210 and ride it in powder on the west coast and the size is fine. I had it in tits deep powder earlier this year and it floated pretty well.

164 for the east coast with limited powder would be overkill IMO...unleass you ureally just want a fast hard charging carver and not worried how playful it is.
that 164.5 with its wider waist is a big fk,n board.
snowjab is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome