![]() |
Future camber concpets
After talking with a friend today he said that Burton is working on a rocker/camber/rocker or camber/rocker/camber design for 2014. Since we mainly ride Neversummer, who have the rocker/camber design, how would an added rocker add or take away from the ride of the board?
|
What on earth are you talking about?
|
Quote:
Burton is apparently working on a double rocker/camber, my friend had already seen the concept for it a week or so ago at the mountain. think of an additional banana in the C2 camber of Lib tech |
Quote:
Adding an extra banana? Always good if you're baking a cake :thumbsup: An extra banana in my snowboard? Now you are just blowing my tiny mind :laugh: |
Quote:
|
eventually boards are going to have bases that look like ripples in water the more camber sections they keep adding.
|
Quote:
|
Sounds a little crazy but hey thats what we said about reverse camber. I think NeverSummer's RC is the best performance out of a reverse board!
|
Quote:
|
Neutral, I wouldn't have been able to predict the way the NS's vario-whatzit would behave in practice, I think adding an extra level of complexity can only be evaluated on the test slope. Speaking of which, if any snowboarding companies would like a volunteer to test their stuff, I've got some free time.... :D
Seriously though, I hope their testing is showing some actual benefit. I'd hate for it to be like adding yet another blade to their razor just so they can sell "new and improved". |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2