![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#23 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Central PA
Posts: 389
|
Quote:
Why is the Heritage too much board in your estimation? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Ottawa, On
Posts: 659
|
I think the freestyle part of the Heritage is a bit of a misnomer. It can rip most jumps and that but it more a hard charger. As far as rails and presses/butters go while possible it is a lot of work. For that reason I don't see the Heritage as a do it all all mountain freestyle board but more a flat out steep line and jump board. This is just my opinion though, I am sure the Heritage can be that board for other people. But like you said, the Proto and I still think the SL would be the NS boards more suited to do it all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 344
|
Nivek, I love Lib Tech but would hardly consider myself a fan boy. I have a Capita Ultrafear, Yes Optimistic, and a T Rice. Every Lib I have ridden does what I like in terms of dampening and edge to edge quickness. I also really like C2.
If you hate their marketing, fine. But they make good boards. I'm not partial. I've stated millions of times, I'm trying to find something I like better than my T Rice. Haven't found it yet. Have also stated I didn't enjoy the TRS or Attack Banana. Look forward to trying a signal. But have to say, if it's anything like the Joystick or Hero, I'll dislike it... |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|