![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 5
|
Looking for a new board. I am 5'11", weigh 175, size 12 boots and am an average to intermediate snowboader. I mainly stick to groomed trails and powder if I can find it and rarely go to the park. After doing a little research, have narrowed it down to Rossignol Taipan, Gnu Carbon Credit or Never Summer SL/Legacy. Any opinions on those or other suggestions? Evo.com has the NS on sale but only in 163 which might be a little long for me. Thanks for the help.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Official SBF Blogger
|
For the Legacy, 63 seems somewhat long-ish for your weight but I was riding 161 when I was about your size which would've been in 1998 or so... if you're never really going in the park I think you could probably manage on the 163, it will be fast and there may be a learning curve to it a bit since the rocker/camber combo some people find it a little squirelly.
The Gnu CC is a really good board for the money. I just peeped on Evo and they only have the CC Wide in a size 156 which may be shorter than you want to go.
__________________
Repping the world's smallest mountains...
aGNARchy: no rules, just gnar! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,784
|
Quote:
Kick your heel (barefoot please, no socks) back against a wall. Mark the floor exactly at the tip of your toe (the one that sticks out furthest - which toe this is will vary by rider). Measure from the mark on the floor to the wall. That is your foot length and is the only measurement that you will want to use. Measure in centimeters if possible, but if not, take inches and multiply by 2.54 (example: an 11.25 inch foot x 2.54 = 28.57 centimeters). Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 5
|
Quote:
The Never Summer seems like a sweet board but I don't know if it's worth the extra $140-$200 compared to the other two. What do you think between the Banana rocker and the hybrid rocker for mainly groomers and powder? The CC has the magnetraction which I see as the major advantage over the Taipan. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Kyoto Japan
Posts: 1,055
|
I am 175 and spend most of my time on a 157 or 158. Not a wide either.
I ride mostly powder and up to 40cm of fresh on this size is fine. A 161 would be fine too IMO, but 163 is longer than you need and when you want to do anything other than powder and carving (ie playing around butters, presses and spins) you will wish you had a shorter board. NS make great boards but look for a shorter board IMO. You may want a wide if you are 12 at 11 I do not need a wide but get your foot measured properly. I ride the proto CT which could work for you if you find a 160. Its good to get a board just the right size you can grow into and enjoy for several years. If you buy a non ideal board because its on sale you will probably end up selling it and buying a new one after one season on it or less. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 5
|
Quote:
Here's what I'm looking at now. Rossi Taipan 158 or 160- $190 Gnu Altered Genetics 159- $360 Gnu Riders Choice 161.5- $310 Any thoughts? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 71
|
Quote:
Snowboard Gear Reviews By The Good Ride |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Kyoto Japan
Posts: 1,055
|
Quote:
If money is an issue the Rossi is a steal and although they are not as trendy as mervins they are solid boards. If you have the cash I would personally go with the altered genetics because a 159 is going to be very versatile and in the sweet spot for our weight. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|