![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 9
|
Hello!
I'm coming on my fifth season riding in Japan. I ride 95% powder, trees, and natural terrain. We get a lot of snow here. For powder riding, I've actually come to prefer twin boards over tapered-boards and pow-specific boards. Twins are more stable for landings off of cliffs and riding switch helps with leg burn. I rode a DC Devun Walsh 157 about sixty times last year and it was great. I'm looking around for a new board for next season. I want an aggressive twin which floats in powder. A twin is preferred, but I'm considering a directional twin also. Right now I'm looking at: Lib Tech T Rice Yes The Greats Rome Mod Rocker Capita Black Snowboard of Death Jones Mountain Twin Anyone ridden these boards? Any other recommendations for a twin free-ride powder board? |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Hokkaido in my mind
Posts: 1,350
|
A twin board is pretty much the opposite of what makes a good powder board, if you insist on a twin the only thing you should really make sure of is that its got plenty of rocker to try and help with getting that nose up. As for specific boards Im not sure as they are not my cup of tea.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 757
|
I think salomon makes some pow twins, Mans board and powder snake i think? I don't know much about them but they might be in the realm of what you are looking for.
http://www.snowboards.com/Salomon-Si...prefv1=Salomon Last edited by Justin; 07-05-2012 at 09:45 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sandpoint / Moscow, ID
Posts: 2,301
|
I understand what you're talking about, I ride a 2010 NS Evo (stiffer than the newer models) primarily in powder/trees and it's so much fun because it's extremely responsive. It takes a little more skill and effort because it's not designed for powder, but with the rocker it does well enough. I do use a slight setback though, about 3/4 in. It's enough to get my weight on the back and keep the front popped - without it you definitely bog in deeper stuff.
Maybe take a look at the NS Proto, it's stiffer than the Evo but still plenty playful.
__________________
PowderHound and TreeNinja |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 757
|
Salomon drift rocker might work as well.
K2 ultra dream looks interesting. Atomic 2012 Sir Floatalot Snowboard at Levelninesports.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 344
|
Cross the BSOD off the list. It's a directional twin.
I loved my Travis Rice. The board could more than handle cliff drops and was very stable on landings. Floated well. One board that looked interesting to me, that you can still find on discount from last year, was the Ride Arcade. Still true twin, pop rods, slime walls for dampening. I rode a DH2 and like that board a lot as well. Ride makes some great products, and both the Arcade and DH2 fit that aggressive, true twin, made for popping off everything in sight. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: fuck boulder
Posts: 2,805
|
My proto handles pow fine with a centered stance, I'd feel confident taking it into deep shit just by setting it back. Obviously its not going to do anything like a real powder board, but I agree with the OP's opinion and have no desire to ride a directional plank just because they are "supposed" to be for big mountain. I'll drop into waist deep pow off a nice fat cornice above treeline without a second thought.
edit: maybe next year Ill have some pow to drop into, instead of a rock field.
__________________
is it late october yet? Last edited by snowklinger; 07-05-2012 at 10:52 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 344
|
I've never understood why NS doesn't make a stiff, aggressive true twin. The SL is the next step up from the Proto, but it's directional. As neat a concept as the Cobra is, they are definitely missing the stiff aggressive true twin. I would have thought that would be the next priority.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Evergreen, CO
Posts: 4,491
|
The Proto basically is that. It has the same flex as the SL. Middle of the road for NS, but NS generally runs pretty stiff compared to other brands.
__________________
"People say that marijuana smoking is going to get in the way of my career. I say to them that on the contrary, my fighting career is getting in the way of my marijuana smoking." -Nick Diaz |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|