Arbor coda & westmark??? - Page 2 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #11 of 20 (permalink) Old 10-04-2012, 10:55 PM Thread Starter
Veteran Member
 
LTshredTN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 569
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiredsport View Post
Hi LT,

The Coda has a much shorter effective edge than the Westmark (3 cm in the 153). Both of the boards have 0 setback. The Coda has a longer tip and tail. Both will do it all but the Westmark will favor Park while the Coda will dig the Pow a little more. Many sick times on the Westmark (Blacklist) for me. That is a major board for Arbor.

Westmark

Coda
so the coda and westmark will feel pretty much the same?? i want something still flexy but can handle it all...also, i wear a 9.5 boot, would i go with westmark or blacklist??
LTshredTN is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 20 (permalink) Old 10-05-2012, 06:37 AM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Wiredsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,404
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 173 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by LTshredTN View Post
so the coda and westmark will feel pretty much the same?? i want something still flexy but can handle it all...also, i wear a 9.5 boot, would i go with westmark or blacklist??
No, you can feel the difference that 3 cm of effective edge makes (between the Coda and Westmark).

The Westmark will be correct for your 9.5's (Between the Westmark and the Blacklist). What is your weight? That will help us dial in the right size for you.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.





To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by Wiredsport; 10-05-2012 at 06:39 AM.
Wiredsport is offline  
post #13 of 20 (permalink) Old 10-05-2012, 11:32 AM Thread Starter
Veteran Member
 
LTshredTN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 569
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiredsport View Post
No, you can feel the difference that 3 cm of effective edge makes (between the Coda and Westmark).

The Westmark will be correct for your 9.5's (Between the Westmark and the Blacklist). What is your weight? That will help us dial in the right size for you.
what diff does that effective edge make??

im 5'11'' 160lbs...been riding a 152cm for 4yrs now
LTshredTN is offline  
post #14 of 20 (permalink) Old 10-05-2012, 11:59 AM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Wiredsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,404
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 173 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by LTshredTN View Post
what diff does that effective edge make??

im 5'11'' 160lbs...been riding a 152cm for 4yrs now
Effective edge is the amount of edge that is in contact with the snow when compressed by your body weight. More effective edge helps with grip and carves and resists slipping on ice.

What model was your old 152?


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.





To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Wiredsport is offline  
post #15 of 20 (permalink) Old 10-05-2012, 12:04 PM Thread Starter
Veteran Member
 
LTshredTN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 569
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiredsport View Post
Effective edge is the amount of edge that is in contact with the snow when compressed by your body weight. More effective edge helps with grip and carves and resists slipping on ice.

What model was your old 152?
yeah i knew that about the edge, just wondered if it would be less playful or not? my last board was a indoor FK and its EE was 115 im pretty sure
LTshredTN is offline  
post #16 of 20 (permalink) Old 10-05-2012, 02:04 PM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Wiredsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,404
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 173 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by LTshredTN View Post
yeah i knew that about the edge, just wondered if it would be less playful or not? my last board was a indoor FK and its EE was 115 im pretty sure
In older camber boards the answer would have been yes, less playful. Now it depends on the design. In rockered boards and hybrid boards it does not critically effect playfulness when the board is not on edge, because that portion of the edge is not in contact (to varying degrees and depending on the design).

The effective edge of the current Indoor FK 152 is 113
The effective edge of the current Coda 153 is 116.4
The effective edge of the current Westmark 153 is 119.6

The Westmark 153 will be awesome for your specs.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.





To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Wiredsport is offline  
post #17 of 20 (permalink) Old 02-21-2013, 01:54 PM
Member
 
jayb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Farmington, NY
Posts: 63
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
I have a cambered 08 Coda 155 that I love I also have a draft in 155cm i am looking for something i can go fast on and still have it be playful I am very torn between the Westmark or a new Rockered Coda. I really don't notice the rocker on the draft unless I am on box or a rail because the flex is so soft. my weight is 170 boot size 9. I was initially thinking westmark, but now another Coda. I would like to stick with NS or Arbor

Rest up my friends, for tomorrow we ride
jayb is offline  
post #18 of 20 (permalink) Old 02-21-2013, 04:20 PM
Member
 
Turch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 42
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My vote is the westmark. It can do anything from all-mountain/pow to park/jibs. It is soft enough to be playful and poppy in the park when you want, but then also have the stability when charging all-mountain and pow runs. The board is just sick. I recommend it if you lean more towards park, but want it to be able to do everything else as well.
Turch is offline  
post #19 of 20 (permalink) Old 02-22-2013, 02:09 AM
Veteran Member
 
jdang307's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,929
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Personally didn't like the Westmark a ton. Loved the Coda.

If you're doing a lot of pressing/buttering/jibbing, maybe.

The Coda is a much much better board for going fast, and still plenty to be playful with. I could do pussy butters (because I'm a pussy) with the Coda. So anyone good could do what you please with it.

It was much more stable at speed.

I think I liked the Coda because it was so springy. Crazy how it's rocker but it would just pop off anything.

But people love their Westmark. It's not a bad board I guess. Turns out I'm not a jibber so I didn't need it.
jdang307 is offline  
post #20 of 20 (permalink) Old 02-22-2013, 10:24 AM
Member
 
jayb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Farmington, NY
Posts: 63
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Thats why i am so torn my draft is to playful, but yet my old Coda is camber so just going to a rockered coda should make a huge difference on the playful side. i think thanks for the help.

Rest up my friends, for tomorrow we ride
jayb is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome