NS Proto CT vs Arbor Westmark - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 7 (permalink) Old 09-02-2012, 09:03 PM Thread Starter
Member
 
briancgrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: AZ
Posts: 76
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
NS Proto CT vs Arbor Westmark

Hey guys, I live in AZ and they don't do any demos out here so I need some help. I currently ride a NS SL and love it but have been getting much more into buttering in the flats and hitting jumps and drops, and running through the park more often. I am trying to decide between the NS Proto CT and the Arbor Westmark to add. I was hoping that someone had ridden both and could give me some insight to help me with my decision. Or if you have heard a lot of reviews about one or whatever, anything should help. Thanks!
briancgrs is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 7 (permalink) Old 09-02-2012, 09:26 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,966
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Depends on whether you plan to keep the SL and start a quiver or whether you are looking for a one-board solution. If the former, then the Westmark for sure (Proto is quite similar to the SL). If the latter, it is more of a toss up.
hktrdr is offline  
post #3 of 7 (permalink) Old 09-02-2012, 10:31 PM Thread Starter
Member
 
briancgrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: AZ
Posts: 76
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I was planning on keeping the SL 161 but was going to go much smaller to a 157 Proto or a 156 Westmark. I guess the appeal of the Proto was that it was so similar to the SL. But that makes sense, why buy basically the same board I have....Thanks
briancgrs is offline  
post #4 of 7 (permalink) Old 09-02-2012, 11:13 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
brian, having owned both I don't think going from a 161 sl to a 157 proto is going to be that big of a change. To me not worth owning both unless you maybe went to a 154 proto. How much do you weigh? The proto is not a stiff board but its not nearly a noodle either... great park board/resort board for me but i'm also riding the 160. If I wanted a proto for strictly jumping and jibs I would be on a 154. The biggest advantage for me for buying the proto and selling my sl was that the proto is true twin.. which I love. If you want to stick with NS have you considered an EVO?
idshred is offline  
post #5 of 7 (permalink) Old 09-02-2012, 11:23 PM Thread Starter
Member
 
briancgrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: AZ
Posts: 76
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by idshred View Post
brian, having owned both I don't think going from a 161 sl to a 157 proto is going to be that big of a change. To me not worth owning both unless you maybe went to a 154 proto. How much do you weigh? The proto is not a stiff board but its not nearly a noodle either... great park board/resort board for me but i'm also riding the 160. If I wanted a proto for strictly jumping and jibs I would be on a 154. The biggest advantage for me for buying the proto and selling my sl was that the proto is true twin.. which I love. If you want to stick with NS have you considered an EVO?
I am 6' and about 185, boot size 10.5

Originally I wanted to do the same, get the proto for the true twin. I dont want a true park board that is a noodle. I want something that if I want to take some backcountry runs then it wont be an issue. To be completely honest, I was 100 percent going Proto until I started researching again....

The reason i don't like the proto....price and graphics...I know that shouldn't be a huge concern but I am not big into spending 550$ on something that I am not thrilled with. But everything that I read seems to show that I will love the way it rides, in which case I would probably get over the looks.

The Westmark, I have a buddy who loves it and that's his only board but he has had to claim the warranty two years in a row and I seem to read a lot about the quality of the product, seems to not be made as well as the NS. Plus its 150$ cheaper....

If i went with the 157 Proto my thought process was:

true twin- easier switch riding/landing, blunted tips-less swing weight. Everything else basically the same as the board that I love right now....

And the westmark is true twin, pop I am not sure compared to proto??, but its the "true-rocker". I have never ridden one so I am not sure how it rides, if I would notice a big difference from the NS tech...

Does any of that make sense?

I kind of feel like I am getting caught up in all of the technology and it's just confusing me at this point. I am just torn...not sure which route to go.

Last edited by briancgrs; 09-02-2012 at 11:30 PM. Reason: forgot something
briancgrs is offline  
post #6 of 7 (permalink) Old 09-02-2012, 11:52 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by briancgrs View Post

Does any of that make sense?
yes. It seems like you have thought this out quite a bit! If I were you I think the curiosity of trying a board from a different company with a different camber profile and ~150 dollars cheaper would be more than enough to sway my decision. I do understand why you want the proto based on your joy of riding your sl... the same reason I bought a proto. There are still a couple of online retailers that have the westmark left in a 156 from 2012 which would save you some more cash.....
idshred is offline  
post #7 of 7 (permalink) Old 09-03-2012, 12:00 AM Thread Starter
Member
 
briancgrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: AZ
Posts: 76
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by idshred View Post
yes. It seems like you have thought this out quite a bit! If I were you I think the curiosity of trying a board from a different company with a different camber profile and ~150 dollars cheaper would be more than enough to sway my decision. I do understand why you want the proto based on your joy of riding your sl... the same reason I bought a proto. There are still a couple of online retailers that have the westmark left in a 156 from 2012 which would save you some more cash.....
I did see those. haha ya I like to do my research....Thanks for the perspective.
briancgrs is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome