Upgrading from a beginner board - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 9 (permalink) Old 09-17-2012, 07:18 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Upgrading from a beginner board

Hi All,

This will be my second season this winter hoping to buy my first board.

Key Stats:
Age: 25
Height: 5' 9"
Weight: 210 lbs

I am looking to mostly ride groomers as I ride mainly on the east coast (Camelback, Mountain Creek, etc...) I don't plan on doing park this season but who knows, but I'm primarily looking for an all mountain/free ride board.

I rented a 2012 Burton TWC Standard 154cm. I've ridden about 8 times this past season (even with the crappy season last year) and got the basics down and truly enjoyed myself. Board was easy to learn on but going faster, the board wasn't so stable (I believe flex was a 2 or 3). I wanted to invest into a board that would be a step up from that board and allow me to progress.

I also was looking into boards that had magnetraction technology as it seems ice patches are somewhat a norm here. A few of my friends ride Lib Tech boards and recommend them highly. This isn't utterly important to have.

I've come across a few boards I had in mind. I noticed I should be riding at a larger size, thinking of somewhere at 157cm+. Also interested in a medium flex I guess around 5-6 and spending less than $500 on the board itself.

2012 Arbor Coda
2013 Arbor Blacklist
2013 Rossignol Templar Magetk
2013 LibTech Skate Banana BTX
2013 GNU Street Series BTX

Two questions:

- Will I notice a significance going from 154cm to 158cm+?
- My boot's a size 9, I noticed boards 157+ seem to be wide... will a wide board be unadvisable?
- Being more active, I've lost some weight (Down from 230). I plan to be around 200 hopefully by the season (late November). Should this influence my size purchase?

Any suggestions/feedback would be appreciated. Thanks!
stylez23 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 9 (permalink) Old 09-17-2012, 07:48 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,966
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by stylez23 View Post
Hi All,

This will be my second season this winter hoping to buy my first board.

Key Stats:
Age: 25
Height: 5' 9"
Weight: 210 lbs

I am looking to mostly ride groomers as I ride mainly on the east coast (Camelback, Mountain Creek, etc...) I don't plan on doing park this season but who knows, but I'm primarily looking for an all mountain/free ride board.

I rented a 2012 Burton TWC Standard 154cm. I've ridden about 8 times this past season (even with the crappy season last year) and got the basics down and truly enjoyed myself. Board was easy to learn on but going faster, the board wasn't so stable (I believe flex was a 2 or 3). I wanted to invest into a board that would be a step up from that board and allow me to progress.

I also was looking into boards that had magnetraction technology as it seems ice patches are somewhat a norm here. A few of my friends ride Lib Tech boards and recommend them highly. This isn't utterly important to have.

I've come across a few boards I had in mind. I noticed I should be riding at a larger size, thinking of somewhere at 157cm+. Also interested in a medium flex I guess around 5-6 and spending less than $500 on the board itself.

2012 Arbor Coda
2013 Arbor Blacklist
2013 Rossignol Templar Magetk
2013 LibTech Skate Banana BTX
2013 GNU Street Series BTX

Two questions:

- Will I notice a significance going from 154cm to 158cm+?
- My boot's a size 9, I noticed boards 157+ seem to be wide... will a wide board be unadvisable?
- Being more active, I've lost some weight (Down from 230). I plan to be around 200 hopefully by the season (late November). Should this influence my size purchase?

Any suggestions/feedback would be appreciated. Thanks!
- Yes, you should notice quite a difference between a board in 154 and the same board in 158+. In your case the difference will be generally beneficial.
- You do not need (or want) a wide board - or even a mid-wide one.
- Not really. While rider weight is one of the key determinants in board selection and sizing, dropping from 210 to 200lbs is too small a change to make any real difference.
hktrdr is offline  
post #3 of 9 (permalink) Old 09-17-2012, 09:48 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks for the input hktrdr... appreciated.

Anyone have any input on the boards I've listed above? I feel now that the Libtech maybe a little more park oriented, so I maybe leaning away from that.
stylez23 is offline  
post #4 of 9 (permalink) Old 09-19-2012, 06:50 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Update: I ended up picking up a pair of Nike Kaijus size 9. They are 27cm from heel to toe... would these still be ok on a regular width board (less than 25.5)?
stylez23 is offline  
post #5 of 9 (permalink) Old 09-19-2012, 08:35 PM
Junior Member
 
Ups_Biker33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 29
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
You will be fine, the 25.5 is measured at the waist not the binding inserts.
Ups_Biker33 is offline  
post #6 of 9 (permalink) Old 09-20-2012, 03:54 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,966
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ups_Biker33 View Post
You will be fine, the 25.5 is measured at the waist not the binding inserts.
Not to mention stance angles...
hktrdr is offline  
post #7 of 9 (permalink) Old 09-20-2012, 08:03 AM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks for all the info and clearing that up.

I've decided on picking up the 2012 Arbor Coda. Now I need to decide if 159 or 157 will be best. Any suggestions? Leaning towards the 159 for all mountain use.
stylez23 is offline  
post #8 of 9 (permalink) Old 09-20-2012, 03:06 PM
Veteran Member
 
jdang307's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,929
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
I was going to say out of your choices I'd go with the coda. My opinion carries no weight, it's just my opinion.

It's a super fun groomer board, and if you want to launch a jump, or even press a box, it'll do it.

At 200 lbs, 159. Plus you never know if you might gain those 10lbs back
jdang307 is offline  
post #9 of 9 (permalink) Old 09-20-2012, 05:02 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Cool thanks for the input jdang... at least the 159 is still available on sale at nearby Ski shops. As for gaining back those 10lbs, let's hope not
stylez23 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome