![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,153
|
Good luck with that. 2012 Proto sold out pretty much everywhere, so it will not be easy to find one (depending on size) - and if you do it is not going to be discounted much/at all (no reason for seller to do so - 2012 is the same board as 2013 and there are plenty of people who want to buy it).
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Front Range, CO
Posts: 288
|
Quote:
To the OP I'm 6'0 135-140 lbs, wear size 11 shoes but my boots are only 9's. I have the 155 SL and I think it would be a perfect size for what your trying to do, sometimes i wish mine was a little shorter to make bigger spins easier but really dont need it at all, plus I love the trees and just bombing down runs. If your boots are 11 I would bring them with you and see how they fit on the board but I think you should be fine. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Mississauga, ON
Posts: 59
|
Ya if I was getting the SL it would be a 155. It's definitely on the table it's good to hear so many good things
You still manage to have a bit of fun on it eh? I wanted the Proto for the playful factor but really I'm probably overstating the difference between it and the SL |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Front Range, CO
Posts: 288
|
Quote:
All that being said I haven't rode the Proto yet but its at the top of the list for my next board, mainly because I ride a lot of park. I have heard it can get a little shady at high speeds but not too bad. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Mississauga, ON
Posts: 59
|
I've been looking at SLs online non-stop of course and I think it's interesting that there's so many colour options! Lol and they look like completely different designs between even the same years model....
This is gonna be interesting
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Mississauga, ON
Posts: 59
|
I've read some SL vs Proto threads-- it all seems pretty comparable
SL is slightly setback in stance and sidecut, with a slightly narrower tail, Proto is true twin SL is more damp, Proto gives you some more feel for park stuff Both have around the same stiffness with the Proto being slightly less I believe Proto has more pop but I've heard they're comparable and I know the SL got a bit more pop for 12/13 so negligible difference Proto has blunted tip and tail as well... SL has soooo many different colours available, and I have the feeling holds its edge a bit better on hardback or ice that we have out here.... Would be nicer to take to a big mountain trip too ..... But the Proto has the fu(kin sick carbonium topsheet All in all, I'd leave tonight with either of these two boards feeling like a champ lol Here's a good comparison http://www.reride.co.uk/blog/2011/11...-proto-evo-sl/ Last edited by Cormier; 10-11-2012 at 10:43 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Reading
Posts: 190
|
Savage!!! I started on an Anagram (full camber) 158 and the thing nearly killed me!!! And I'm 180lbs!! Then I got a 156 skate banana (09/10 i think) which revolutionised my riding! Then I got a Proto which I adore!! I rode the very same skate banana the other day at the dome after getting off the Evo. It showed me how much ... Better ...vario grip is compared to the older magnetraction - although they have lots of different ones now which are supposed to be a lot less aggressive. Has no one mentioned Arbor Blacklist? It's mid wide and highly regarded.
__________________
If it's a real goose, is it propaganda? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|