![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#61 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 947
|
Quote:
I rode two models of SL 155 over the years and I agree with ShredLife, that while the SL is stiffer than the Proto, it is still kind of soft for a freeride board (more of an all-mountain board). I also agree that the SL has way more dampening which makes for a better ride outside of the park. Last edited by lonerider; 10-05-2012 at 04:06 PM. |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#62 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Reading
Posts: 190
|
Quote:
I haven't said anything for a while. And I own a 157 Proto and 154 Evo both 2012. Firstly I totally f***ing love these boards. I am 175 lbs. Proto for all mountain Evo for domes. And I honestly don't believe there is a great deal of difference between these boards!! Evo will chatter more at speeds than the Proto but the Proto is no charger either! That said I got 114kmh on it - but it scared the absolute shit out of me! It is hardly noticeably stiffer than the Evo to hand flex it. Evo is the funnest board I've ever ridden but I think I'd vote Proto myself. If you're more about the bombing then it will surpass the Evo (if not by a long way) but it is still flexible and you can butter the hell out it. Never found it hard to initiate a turn on the CT. Look into SL too maybe. If its not rated as much stiffer tan the Proto then it it is still pretty flexible!!
__________________
If it's a real goose, is it propaganda? |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|