![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 5
|
I'm in between buying a Evo or an SL.
I ride about 60% mountain/trees and 40% park. For the Evo I was looking at the 150 or 152 For the SL I was looking at the 151 or 153 I’m 5’5”, right around 140lbs with a size 9 boot. What board and size would be best? The more opinions the better Thanks! |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
![]() Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Mid-Michigan
Posts: 1,491
|
Everyone is going to say the same thing.
Proto. It's the board between the Evo and the SL. I'll let them tell you the size.
__________________
'12 NS Legacy 163 Days on snow 2012/2013 season:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Under the influence...
Posts: 1,152
|
This relies mostly on what you do on the mountain. If you're a pressy, buttery dude in the park, you're probably gonna want the Evo. The SL may be a bit more stable at speed and maybe on big jumps (though the Evo can hold its own). But yeah, the Proto should be in your consideration as well...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Official SBF Blogger
|
Quote:
Otherwise, Proto 152 and you'll grow in to it. If you're done growing you can always pack on a few pounds by going on a diet consisting of french fries and malt liquor.
__________________
Repping the world's smallest mountains...
aGNARchy: no rules, just gnar! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,063
|
Kind of shitty advice ... but all 3 would work well. If you like bombing or real big features the Evo may be a bit soft, but can handle it if you can. I rode the Evo at Breck and Loveland (I'm 145, board was 152). Imperial and the blackies weren't open yet (shitty season) so I didn't get to test.
But racing my friends the board started to flap a little. Even under Chair 8 with the runs with all the dunes (I think it was Chair 8). I'd lean Proto/SL. With 40% park and trees, probably a Proto. If you go SL the 151 was enough board for me (also rode that, but I sucked then, not that I'm good now but I'm better). |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 947
|
Quote:
Personally, I would lean toward the SL 153 I just like the damper construction of SL on the slopes. Unless you *favorite* thing to do in the park is butters/presses on boxes. If that's true I would go with either the Evo 152. If you feel like you are in-between then Proto 152 - you like to jib, but it's not your *absolute* favorite thing. I prefer it to the Evo in general as it has better snap. I wouldn't be worried about the length. I ride the Proto 154cm and it is extremely easy to handle and light to swing around for me. Last edited by lonerider; 10-03-2012 at 04:21 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
|
Quote:
Having owned several of Evo's & SL's, they can both do what you want, but the Proto splits the difference.
__________________
14 NeverSummer Proto HD . 13 Never Summer Cobra . 12 Gnu Rider's Choice C2PTX 13 Now IPO . 12 K2 Formula . 11 K2 Formula 13 NB x 686 580 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| never summer |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|