![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 9
|
A little background info: I'm 6'2", weigh about 205 lbs, and wear size 12 boots. I ride in the Midwest so I'm mostly concerned with park and groomer performance. Consider myself an intermediate park rider and looking to improve.
I've done a lot of research on boards for the upcoming season and have decided that I definitely want something with an alternative camber profile and more freestyle focused. These are the boards I've narrowed it down to; NS Revolver 158, Arbor Blacklist 157, Rome Mod Rocker Wide 158, NS Proto CTX 158, and the Lib Tech Travis Rice Pro 157. It's important to me that whichever board I get is playful enough to progress with in the park but isn't too soft to take on the big features. Any advice would be greatly appreciated and additional suggestions are more than welcome. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Reading
Posts: 190
|
Blacklist I'd say. Could go longer at your weight if the option was there - for groomer performance. Pretty sure you'd still be on a very fun and easy manipulatable board at 160cm, but then stay 157 if you will be in the park a LOT. I have the Proto 157 (size 8 feet) 175lbs and love the absolute shit out of it but I hear the CTX is a little slow edge to edge and I've not heard that about the blacklist. I don't think the Travis Rice would be a great deal of fun in the park....
__________________
If it's a real goose, is it propaganda? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 9
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,075
|
Quote:
I think it should be fine. Don't forget the Arbor Coda Last edited by jdang307; 10-08-2012 at 08:52 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 9
|
Sweet vids. That's exactly the kind of stuff I was talking about. For a second there I was leaning towards the Blacklist but I'm still undecided, I think it would be a good flex for me but I prefer the camber profile of the NS. The only reason I say that is because I've talked to a lot of riders who experienced too much washout with pure reverse cambers and a little more difficulty stomping bigger landings. If I got a 160 Revolver instead of a 158 Proto CTX would the added board of the 160 take away some of the noodle in the Revolver and give them comparable flexes?
I looked into the Coda and saw it's a directional board whereas I'm more interseted in more of a true twin. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Mordor
Posts: 5,418
|
Blacklist, but get the 160. You won't get enough meat out of it in the 57 to be comfortable on any jumps bigger than 25ft. It will still be plenty playful and jibbable.
__________________
Snowboarding Sucks. Buy my stuff 2014 Flow Rush LTD 153 $200 2014 Flow Fuse SE Med $100 2012 Trek Remedy Carbon 9.8 $3500 http://rockies.craigslist.org/bik/3766331309.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 9
|
So, I just found an Arbor Blacklist 2012 available in both 157 and 160 for about $100 less than the 2013 model that is pretty much the same board but with a slightly downgraded base. (Sintered vs extruded). I have to buy it right? In 160 that is. Have a little somethin left over for some new bindings...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 446
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| blacklist, evo, never summer, proto |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|