![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 58
|
I'm just wondering if Burton do a stiff and damp board with the flying V profile? I went from a cambered Custom to a NS SL. If there is a difference in carving ability and edge hold then I'm not good enough to notice. The float in pow I noticed straight away - much easier on the back leg.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 161
|
I'm 6'0" and ~205lbs. and wear a US size 12 boot. My first Custom X was an '09 164W. My current is an '11 162W. Both are paired with same year Cartel EST bindings. I really couldn't tell the difference the 2cm made between the two, but the CX is a badass carver / bomber. It's my go-to board. I've ripped it everywhere from NE ice, Summit County resorts in CO, Pacific NW mashed potato snow, to B.C. groomers.
If you dial in all the setback possible (~2.5" maybe?) it's "ok" in dense or shallow pow conditions. The stiffness and camber profile mean you'll still have to weight your back leg significantly to get through the deep stuff without the nose diving under. I used it for everything until I got a powder deck. Now I only use it 80% of the time...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
|
Quote:
Antler has lots of tech but they say its softer than the Custom X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
|
Quote:
Yah, although there are often discounts. Personally I've always been a bit confused about the Mystery/Method - all the high tech (which to me means light weight and stiff) seems to be a much better fit with a cambered board rather than a hybrid shape. Snowhound wanted to know the stiffest burton flying V board - I think it would be the Mystery, which would still not be as stiff as the custom X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Resident Creep-o-saurus
![]() Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 3,479
|
Quote:
Makes my EST bindings kinda useless as now I'm looking at alternates for a stiff advanced freeride board. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Denmark
Posts: 72
|
It sounds like most of you agree..
160 for more freestyle 164 for pow but i still have the 163 flow Both with cartel's /Cheers Are there any one obvious im missing if its still have to be awesome freeride/carving on groomers and perform good in pow ? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|