2013 Burton Custom X - Page 2 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #11 of 23 (permalink) Old 10-24-2012, 08:56 AM
Veteran Member
 
Snow Hound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 788
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 146 Post(s)
I'm just wondering if Burton do a stiff and damp board with the flying V profile? I went from a cambered Custom to a NS SL. If there is a difference in carving ability and edge hold then I'm not good enough to notice. The float in pow I noticed straight away - much easier on the back leg.
Snow Hound is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 23 (permalink) Old 10-24-2012, 08:58 AM
Senior Member
 
qwezxc12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 167
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm 6'0" and ~205lbs. and wear a US size 12 boot. My first Custom X was an '09 164W. My current is an '11 162W. Both are paired with same year Cartel EST bindings. I really couldn't tell the difference the 2cm made between the two, but the CX is a badass carver / bomber. It's my go-to board. I've ripped it everywhere from NE ice, Summit County resorts in CO, Pacific NW mashed potato snow, to B.C. groomers.

If you dial in all the setback possible (~2.5" maybe?) it's "ok" in dense or shallow pow conditions. The stiffness and camber profile mean you'll still have to weight your back leg significantly to get through the deep stuff without the nose diving under. I used it for everything until I got a powder deck. Now I only use it 80% of the time...
qwezxc12 is offline  
post #13 of 23 (permalink) Old 10-25-2012, 10:07 AM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Denmark
Posts: 96
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Forgot i have a 163 Flow infinite 2009-2010 not sure. That for sure is softer than CX and may suit pow a little better?.. Still camber though . .

/Snoopy
The-Snoopy is offline  
post #14 of 23 (permalink) Old 10-25-2012, 10:42 AM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,608
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Blog Entries: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snow Hound View Post
I'm just wondering if Burton do a stiff and damp board with the flying V profile? I went from a cambered Custom to a NS SL. If there is a difference in carving ability and edge hold then I'm not good enough to notice. The float in pow I noticed straight away - much easier on the back leg.
Maybe the Mystery?


Antler has lots of tech but they say its softer than the Custom X
Lamps is offline  
post #15 of 23 (permalink) Old 10-25-2012, 11:08 AM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Denmark
Posts: 96
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
I hope your'e sitting down. .the burton mystery cost in Denmark 12000 DKK thats just over 2000 US dollars :-P..

The X is around 850 US dollars over here. .


/Cheers Snoopy
The-Snoopy is offline  
post #16 of 23 (permalink) Old 10-25-2012, 12:04 PM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,608
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Blog Entries: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by The-Snoopy View Post
I hope your'e sitting down. .the burton mystery cost in Denmark 12000 DKK thats just over 2000 US dollars :-P..

The X is around 850 US dollars over here. .


/Cheers Snoopy

Yah, although there are often discounts. Personally I've always been a bit confused about the Mystery/Method - all the high tech (which to me means light weight and stiff) seems to be a much better fit with a cambered board rather than a hybrid shape.

Snowhound wanted to know the stiffest burton flying V board - I think it would be the Mystery, which would still not be as stiff as the custom X
Lamps is offline  
post #17 of 23 (permalink) Old 10-25-2012, 02:05 PM
Reformed Creep-o-saurus
 
poutanen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 6,447
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lamps View Post
Yah, although there are often discounts. Personally I've always been a bit confused about the Mystery/Method - all the high tech (which to me means light weight and stiff) seems to be a much better fit with a cambered board rather than a hybrid shape.
+1, they got rid of the T6/T7 series which was light, stiff and cambered (with plenty of advanced materials tech)...

Makes my EST bindings kinda useless as now I'm looking at alternates for a stiff advanced freeride board.
poutanen is offline  
post #18 of 23 (permalink) Old 10-25-2012, 02:18 PM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,608
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Blog Entries: 10
Custom x is still a pretty good alternative.

Vapor (which I have) is very light, just a little softer.
Lamps is offline  
post #19 of 23 (permalink) Old 10-25-2012, 03:02 PM
Reformed Creep-o-saurus
 
poutanen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 6,447
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lamps View Post
Custom x is still a pretty good alternative.

Vapor (which I have) is very light, just a little softer.
I'm looking at one of these instead...

poutanen is offline  
post #20 of 23 (permalink) Old 10-28-2012, 04:15 PM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Denmark
Posts: 96
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
It sounds like most of you agree..

160 for more freestyle

164 for pow but i still have the 163 flow

Both with cartel's

/Cheers

Are there any one obvious im missing if its still have to be awesome freeride/carving on groomers and perform good in pow ?
The-Snoopy is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome