![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Official SBF Blogger
|
6' 210 lbs here not huge but pretty big, should be more like 195 but haven't touched that in many years
![]() Riding 157ish for park or 160ish all mountain.
__________________
Repping the world's smallest mountains...
aGNARchy: no rules, just gnar! |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
![]() Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 486
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Kazachstan
Posts: 255
|
Honestly, i don't understand why such a big guys ride a something less then 168? Really? Can someone explain?
Noone rides pow? Or you got so steep angle, so i can ride 164 in pow being 250 lbs? Or noone ride agressivly? Mean 165 can hold you? |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
|
Quote:
Hybrid camber is a beautiful thing. It allows us bigger guys to ride smaller boards. ;-) Sent from my SSGSIIE4GT (or the phone with the longest name ever) using VerticalSports.Com App |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 116
|
Granted we don't get much pow in my neck of the woods, but my massive friend and I had no trouble in 2 feet of powder last season. I prefer smaller boards for the trees. Maybe if I rode a massive board I would really like it, but I've felt comfortable riding agressively on a 158 even.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
![]() Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Mid-Michigan
Posts: 1,492
|
Quote:
Do I ride aggressively? I 'unno, I think so. I'm trying to hit 50mph, I'm hitting large (for Michigan) kickers. I play on boxes. I ride boarder cross runs without speed checks. I'm beginning to enter glades now. My Legacy has only made me feel unstable on flats while traversing relatively slow.
__________________
'12 NS Legacy 163 Days on snow 2012/2013 season:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Probably at work wasting time
Posts: 869
|
Quote:
I’m 6’4’’ and 205-210 riding a 161.5 T-Rice for everything including deep powder and it’s a great size. I’m definitely thinking of getting a more powder specific board for the deep days and for that I would likely move back up in the 165 range. For an all mountain board with a hybrid camber 161-163 could be a pretty good range for you but if you are talking powder specific, I think you are in the right range with the 166. Or you could go bigger if you are looking for a big mountain powder board. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 757
|
Quote:
i rode a 159w park deck in a foot + of fresh and it was so much fun, that board was flat camber (solomon riot). In really deep stuff 159w is to small unless it is steep. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|