![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 37
|
Quote:
![]() Seriously, the Danny Kass C2 BTX is another Mervin board with a profile that's similar to the Banana Magic, right? The sales pitch makesa lot of sense, I can see how it'd be a loose buttery board that'll still be stable enough outside of the park&pow...But spec sheets and sales talks only tell you that much ![]() So does/did anyone ride either the Gnu Danny Kass or the Banana Magic? Or anyone maybe even compare it to the slightly stiffer and less rocker-y attack banana and/or TRS? I know I'm asking a lot, but it's A LOT of money for me to spend right now, so I figured it's worth the (long) shot asking... Maybe I'm even overthinking this, for all I know the actual differences in feel/stability/butterness/flew are hardly noticeable and more of a marketing thing ![]() Thnx for the patience, I know I'm indecisive and boring here
Last edited by Thom; 11-22-2012 at 03:20 PM. |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#13 (permalink) | ||
|
Resident Creep-o-saurus
![]() Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 3,491
|
Quote:
![]() In all seriousness if you're on hardpack/ice a lot you want more effective edge to dig in. You're the same height as me so no reason you could swing a 154 around. Don't be a pussy. ![]() Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 37
|
Yeah, I google'd my ass off the last hours/days, there's indeed a couple of nice reviews, and even sililar threads and side by side test.
I was just hoping for a last piece of valuable advice that could help me pull the trigger Saw all the youtube clips on the subject a zillion times too, the one you posted is helpfull, but sorta confusing/shallow at the same time too:s Anyway, I just mailed a store about that 2011/2012 TRS (151cm) I mensioned earlier. Basicly told them that they'd have a deal if they gave me the slightest little extra discount ![]() I'd kinda have to hurt myself to be able to afford a brand new 2012/2013 board, and I'm willing to take the chance on a 151 board, especially since this one's supposed to have extra grip and a bit more stiffness than what I'm used to. I'll let you guys know what answer I'll get. Thanks again for all the replies. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,163
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 37
|
Quote:
But it works both ways too I guess. Meaning I might as well get the 151 and get used to having an inch less effective edge and go with the shorter 151, right? Which brings me to the answer of your other question about why libtechs can supposedly be ridden slightly shorter. I think the 'banana tech C2 BTX' technology is supposed to deliver more grip than a 'regular' longer board. One of the reasons why I'm mainly looking at the Libtechs in the first place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Resident Creep-o-saurus
![]() Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 3,491
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 37
|
Quote:
I agree after my first powder day on the next board, there's a good chance I'll regret getting a 151 board instead of a 154cm one. But with my luck, just like the last two seasons, there'll be little or no fresh pow at all, in which case I'll do fine with a shorter all moutain board to cruise groomers and hit the park on a daily basis ![]() I'm just gonna let it depend on what deal I'll get on that '12 TRS I mensioned. If that doesn't work out, I'll trow one of my guitars on ebay to fund a new 154 libtech TRS
Last edited by Thom; 11-24-2012 at 02:08 AM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|