![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: fuck boulder
Posts: 2,823
|
Quote:
lonerider, you can't argue with someone when they tell you that you come off as condescending, it just makes it more so. You do come off that way a little, and pretty sure Grafta and I like ya(ok not sure about Grafta, he is pretty badass). Maybe I come off the same way, dunno, sounds like you ride pretty good, but no amount of ability really makes your opinions more factual. Facts are facts and opinions are opinions.
__________________
is it late october yet? Last edited by snowklinger; 11-22-2012 at 09:11 PM. |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,784
|
Hi NJM,
You are going to have a lot of fun on that deck. Flat rock is very easy to learn on. This profile (generality) is stable and is very catch free and easy going. They don't love ice or extreme hardpack and the require care at speed, but on the whole you have a fun design to learn and progress on. Plese post up your weight and foot size, as well as the length of your deck. It is still important that you have the correct size. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 6
|
Quote:
I'm 5'4", 127Lbs and my foot size is women's 8. My board is a 147. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) | |
|
Resident Creep-o-saurus
![]() Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 3,489
|
Quote:
![]() I think it still stands true for the average rider a directional shape and flex board will be better in the powder while going forward. Actually this is true for Rice and the rest of the gang, but he's got the ability to overcome the limitations of the board. People have been telling me for years I should be on a rocker board in the powder. My mad skillz allow me to rock the camber however I want on whatever I want! Ha!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) | |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
![]() |
Quote:
I also agree with your main point, that the average rider probably doesn't care much about riding switch on powder days. I think it's pretty well accepted that directional boards make powder riding easier in your preferred stance (swallowtail powder boards must exist for a reason). Slightly directional twins are a compromise, making things slightly easier in the preferred stance, at a slight expense when riding switch. Riding a twin in powder means keeping most of your weight over your rear leg, which gets tiring, but riding switch allows the other leg to take a turn. I guess I should qualify this by saying I'm probably less experienced than many here, and the current limit of my spinning ability is 180s, but I have at least ridden powder on both a directional-twin and a true-twin. I like my current board, a true-twin, because I like to ride switch a lot, even on powder days. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Whistler, BC
Posts: 311
|
I'd say the average rider is better off with a slightly directional snowboard over a true twin.
True twins start to gain the advantage if you do a lot of freestyle and/or ride switch often (or if you're working your way up to doing that). Honestly, it feels a little bit better doing switch tricks on a true twin, but the difference isn't major and I'm saying this as someone who regularly spins switch 5s and up. In the end if you get used to spinning/landing switch on a slightly directional but twin-ish shape, you can even end up preferring that feel just due to your muscle memory remembering the feeling.
__________________
I write for Snomie.com - How To Snowboard Videos, Snowboard Tips & Snowboard Lessons |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|