Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums banner

Help me pick a NeverSummer board!

4K views 21 replies 10 participants last post by  Slush Puppie 
#1 · (Edited)
I know there are prob 100 threads like this, but bear with me :)

Neversummer Proto VS Heritage

I am 5'11, 165-170, Size 11 Nike Kaiju Boots

I have Union Force MC 2013 Bindings(Got them for a deal too good to pass up, like half off)

I do about 75% Mountain & 25% Park, I like to play around, jumps, ect
I live on the east coast

So..

160 VS 158 Heritage
160 VS 157 Proto

Pros V Cons, I cant really see any really big difference in tech used in either board

I am leaning more towards the Proto, how will that be with the Union Force MC bindings?
 
#7 · (Edited)
I'm 5'9" 155 lbs and I own the Proto 154 and the SL 155. If you only are riding the park 25%. I would say SL, Cobra or Heritage. Since you say carbonium topsheet - I say Cobra 158 or Heritage 158.

All this talk about needing twin for switch riding is overblown - in most cases, it is a pretty small difference. Don't worry about it until you are starting to land 540s... or not even... a Burton Fish is about as directional as you could possible get... 2" setback, huge taper, cutout tail...

 
#8 ·
Just east coast? I'd say the Evo.

Since u didn't choose that, Proto :D

Unless you plan trips to J-hole and the like, the Heritage is just extra board you don't need, hence my suggestion of the Evo even. I'm getting one soon that will replace my Proto if the only thing we have to ride all year is a WROD like last year.

The scaled down boards will be more playful and fun on smaller mountains.
 
#13 ·
Um, nothing wrong with buying something you like the look of! Just don't compromise elsewhere to do it.

For the riding you describe Proto or SL do seem like the best choices.

The heritage is going to be quite stiff if you're in the park 25% of the time. The Cobra is(I think) not quite as stiff as the Heritage but has some directional shaping which gives it more forwards float in pow at the slight expense of switch capability.

What's you're reason for needing the 'carbonium'? On this years proto is just looks like carbon weave embossed plastic. Might save a tiny bit of weight, other than that you wouldn't miss it.
 
#18 ·
How many people would regularly take a Heritage to the park? Not many - or not nearly as many as would take an SL freeriding. Hence, SL is more of an all-mountain board than the Heritage. Now, I would still consider the Heritage pretty much an all-mountain board, but certainly less so than the SL.

Incidentally, FWIW NS only labels the Cobra, SL/Legacy, and Proto as all-mountain.

BTW, SL is 2 steps above the softest park board (Proto is 1 step up).
 
#19 ·
I own an sl and heritage in 155 and have rode the proto. The proto isn't really softer than the sl in practice - just far less damp.
The heritage, while stiffer than the sl is fine for park. It's not any good for presses but its better on jumps.
The heritage is a better 'all mt' board for me because it charges way harder than the sl. Way better for busting thru and over chop.
 
#20 ·
I own an sl and heritage in 155 and have rode the proto. The proto isn't really softer than the sl in practice - just far less damp.
Agree. But dampness is part of 'going up' the scale.

The heritage, while stiffer than the sl is fine for park. It's not any good for presses but its better on jumps.
Mostly true, but most people would consider the SL to be the better park board. It might lose out a bit to the Heritage in the jump line, but is way better for jibbing.

The heritage is a better 'all mt' board for me because it charges way harder than the sl. Way better for busting thru and over chop.
Most people would call that big mountain/freeriding. All-mountain includes that, as well as park, etc.
I prefer Heritage as well, but the SL is clearly more of an all-mountain board. On balance, the disadvantage the SL has in charging is smaller than the advantage it has in the park.
 
#22 ·
Hey, I've been charging pretty hard on an Evo up until now and that feels fine until it gets fairly lumpy. Keeping up with more experienced riders on stiff cambered boards anyhoo. Frozen slush mounds get to be a little taxing.

While I'm sure boards stiffer than the SL are 'best' for it, especially if thats all you do. But I don't think its that a 'must have' requirement?

Hope so anyway, my SL arrived in the post today :)

Really comes down to either making the best tradeoff, or else having the perfect board (to hand) for every situation. Oh and rider preference!
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top