Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums

Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums (
-   Boards (
-   -   Burton Nug.. smaller the better?? (

Regul8or 12-05-2012 10:46 PM

Burton Nug.. smaller the better??
Hey guys,

Just picked up a Burton Nug Directional in size 144. I can't wait to try out this board this weekend at whistler, and I will def be writing up a review. On to my question. I had my choice of a 144 or a 148. I understand that you should ride this board 8-10cm smaller. I currently ride a 156 Custom on Burton triad bindings. My size is 5'9 170lbs. Which is at the very border of the size chart for this board.

I don't spend too much time in the park... I've read and watched all the reviews about how its a good board for pow (Dave Downing clip def persuaded me a little), but I decreased 12cm from my usual board size.

Anyone have any experience all-mountain with this board (esp. in powder), and do you think I should have gone for the 148?

Any thoughts would be appreciated.


Supra 12-05-2012 11:34 PM

yeah, but what are you going to do if people tell you the 148 would have been better?
the 148 will give you more float, the 144 will be easier to throw around

Regul8or 12-07-2012 08:05 AM

Well I would just swap them. The Burton outlet has a nice return policy :) . I was just concerned over the weight ranges and such. thanks for the input, keep it coming!

StreetDoc 12-07-2012 08:11 AM

144 is TINY.

Regul8or 12-07-2012 08:12 AM

Yep,it is pretty comical.. do you have any experience with this board though?? It's supposed to be ridden much smaller.

StreetDoc 12-07-2012 08:21 AM

Honestly I don't, I looked into a 150 and I'm not that much bigger than you (200lbs) but 144 sounds tiny for anything other than a dedicated park board.

Lamps 12-07-2012 09:42 AM

are you looking at least year's sizes - this year Burton is showing 142, 146, and 150 for Nug sizes.

I would say that if you're getting this board as your only board i'd get the bigger size but if it's a 2nd board go small, it's kind of the point of it.

I rode one last year in spring conditions; it was a lot of fun even if you're not a park person, really easy to turn and easy to ollie and spin and so on. Personally when I think powder I think of a tapered board with a lot of setback or maybe something powder oriented but twin like the Sherlock, which is very floaty. I have a sherlock which I bought for trips out west, I doubt that if I had a Nug and I was told there was going to be deep snow I'd take it instead but I haven't ridden the Nug in deep snow so who knows, lots of fresh at whistler latlely, post a review.

Supra 12-07-2012 03:27 PM

Ok, so swap it for the bigger size. Don't be worried about how small it is compared to reg boards.

Lamps, last year they had a directional version of the nug with iirc s-rocker and a little taper. Just awesome for allmountain. This year it has become the Root, with flat camber

Bleedblue666 12-07-2012 03:38 PM

I ride a nug 146 twin,and we are about the same size you may want the 148 for the float.

Edge 12-07-2012 03:39 PM

148. Even I wouldn't go for a 144 and I'm 50lbs lighter than you.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.1.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome