![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
|
Sintered base is a must on a pow board. Only time I would say it doesn't matter is for a beginner that won't notice the difference and on park boards that are going to get destroyed anyways.
__________________
14 NeverSummer Proto HD . 13 Never Summer Cobra . 12 Gnu Rider's Choice C2PTX 13 Now IPO . 12 K2 Formula . 11 K2 Formula 13 NB x 686 580 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 409
|
Quote:
I say the opposite, sort of. I say it's not a must. If the board is cheaper than a sintered one then sure, go for it. Don't let it stop your purchase. I just don't like extruded bases on expensive lib techs. I had a first year capita charlie slasher, which has an extruded base...and it rode fine in powder. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 862
|
Does it mean that if i want a high end pow board, extruded would be that much of a difference? Fuck, why would bataleon make a extruded base on their only pow board. That leaves me with Jones Hovercraft. Triple, have you rode any extruded base pow boards? Because im guessing that pow is the opposite from groomers and you dont need slick to get going. I dont really know but lib techs with tnt base are retarded for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Hokkaido in my mind
Posts: 1,355
|
If its steep who cares, if its not you want all the speed you can get.
The price difference between extruded and sintered base is like $10 for a board and thats buying a small order for just 1 board. For a big manufacturer it would be about $3 I reckon. There really is no excuse for using an extruded base on a powder board IMO. Hovercraft is small for you IMO.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 862
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,150
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Hokkaido in my mind
Posts: 1,355
|
Quote:
THis is all IMO but you are of similar stats to me and I ride a 164 all mountain but a 180 for powder. Instead downsizing for swallowtail you should try keeping the same or similar length and utilizing that length in the nose. It works a treat. You will wish you had more than 160 when you are in the deep stuff. The hovercraft is a great boad with great design principals but its not built for the big boys.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 862
|
Ok, sure. Tnt base is what they call an extruded base. Just sayin'. If im spending that much for a board, it better have sintered base. And the way extruded bases are made makes them inferior to sintered, no matter how good they are. Anyways, ETM, what are your stats. Im about 200lbs and the 158 is rated for me, while i read that downsizing for a pow board will give you more maneuverability while taper, setback and swallow tail keep the float.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,150
|
Quote:
10 characters (actually just 1 simple character - blunted_nose) |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|