Flex and Profile - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
SnowboardingForum.com is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-28-2012, 08:15 AM   #1 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 27
Default Flex and Profile

The Board flex is responsible for doing butters,jumps etc or the Board Profile?
At most reviews I read , people refers mostly to camber,reverse camber profiles etc for buttering,park,jumps jibbing etc and not too much for at board flex...

-For example can you do better butters with a flexible campered board rather than a non very flexible but rockered board?
The size of board affect this ?
snoWorm is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 12-28-2012, 08:51 AM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 227
Default

your post is all over the place but i'll take a crack at it and someone else will correct me as needed.

flex is probably more important than profile. a softer board can be buttered more easily because it's easier to bend. a stiffer board gives you a more stable platform for taking on jumps. i believe a softer flex board is also better for jibs as well as they're generally not as aggressive.

however, a rocker-profile board is slightly easier to press because of its inherent shape. but a regular/flat profile board is better for jumps because it gives you more pop out of an ollie due to the leverage created. rockered boards also tend to wash out on landings and are generally seen as better for jibs due to its more mellow ride.
onefutui2e is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2012, 12:07 PM   #3 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 27
Default

So what is most important to choose the better board for you? First the Flex and then the profile or the opposite?

If all these you said are right , anyone can say that a rockered but flexible board has the same +/- with a campered but stiffer board ...
snoWorm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 10:11 AM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 227
Default

are you a beginner snowboarder? if so, i'm going to say none of it matters. they make too many boards covering the entire spectrum of flex/profile that you're going to drive yourself NUTS trying to decide which board is the right one for you. i would suggest a medium-flex rockered board for ease of learning.

and i guess your second statement is somewhat true. there are compromises made when going rocker or camber, stiff or noodle. if you're a beginner, again, a medium-flex rocker board will be a great start.
onefutui2e is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 01:03 PM   #5 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 27
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by onefutui2e View Post
are you a beginner snowboarder? if so, i'm going to say none of it matters. they make too many boards covering the entire spectrum of flex/profile that you're going to drive yourself NUTS trying to decide which board is the right one for you. i would suggest a medium-flex rockered board for ease of learning.

and i guess your second statement is somewhat true. there are compromises made when going rocker or camber, stiff or noodle. if you're a beginner, again, a medium-flex rocker board will be a great start.
I am not a beginner, I woul say "advanced beginner" . I had a Burton Twin '07 161 (6.1'' , 180lbs), that was either too big or too stiff! Absolutely something much more playful and flexible and ofcourse sorter! But I do not know how to choose between all these boards! (Burton Hero is one choice do not you think?)
snoWorm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 11:26 PM   #6 (permalink)
AAA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 387
Default

You can't really predict how a board will ride by focusing on just one element. A board's riding characteristics are derived from the entire construction of the board...aerial profile (length, width, sidecut geometry, taper), horizontal profile (various configurations of camber and rocker), flex pattern (as in stiffness AND distribution), and materials, so you need to look at it all.

Unfortunately, manufacturer descriptions are typically more focused on hype than substance, and are so woefully inadequate. "Published" online and mag reviews are even worse, being little more than manufacturer paid advertisements or store sales promotions under such rediculous guise.

To compare boards without riding them, it's difficult, but you need to seek out peer reviews and look for reoccuring themes in them. Then you need to look into actual build information (numbers) from the manufacturers to try to get a sense of how riding and construction correlates. From there, you can start to get a sense of how you can expect a board to ride. Actually RIDING different boards is of course ideal, but may or may not be realistic.
AAA is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:46 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums