Going from EC2 to Camrock - Page 4 - Snowboarding Forum

Wiredsport · 01-15-2013, 11:43 AM

Hi,

The sub-message of this thread is that the tech that is described in the literature is not always what shows up in the board...

Sick-Pow · 01-15-2013, 11:44 AM

I think the Never SUmmer and Flying V and C3 are better versions of rocker and camber IMO.

skip11 · 01-15-2013, 12:10 PM

I haven't tried C3 yet but I don't really like NS' version when I demoed the Evo. I rode the T.Rice for 2 seasons before I got the YES the other day.

01-15-2013, 11:43 AM	#31 (permalink)
Wiredsport -LIFETIME MEMBER- Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 1,796	Hi, The sub-message of this thread is that the tech that is described in the literature is not always what shows up in the board... __________________ Gnu \| Rome \| Bataleon \| Flow \| Electric \| Roxy \| Arbor \| Flux \| Dragon \| Neff http://www.wiredsport.com/?snow http://www.wiredsport.com/blog/

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

01-15-2013, 11:44 AM	#32 (permalink)
Sick-Pow Veteran Member Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 1,236	I think the Never SUmmer and Flying V and C3 are better versions of rocker and camber IMO.

01-15-2013, 12:10 PM	#33 (permalink)
skip11 Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 380	I haven't tried C3 yet but I don't really like NS' version when I demoed the Evo. I rode the T.Rice for 2 seasons before I got the YES the other day.