![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5
|
Recently relocated to Midwest and starting snowboarding again.
Man made snow and ice are the norm, looking for board that is stable, will not easily catch an edge and that handles icy conditions with ease. No park riding, just cruising with kids on most days. Any used board recommendations would be helpful. I can't seem to find a Palmer Timeless which was recommended by a friend. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 582
|
tech that doesn't catch edge is usually not the best on ice. Standard camber is best on ice, but is more likely to catches edges. You can either pick your poison from those or try something with hybrid camber + magnatraction (lib, gnu, neversummer, smokin, etc)
edit: don't know anything about Palmer's FLF "catch-free" tech, but I do know they put it on more than just the timeless Last edited by extra0; 01-11-2013 at 03:01 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Resident Creep-o-saurus
![]() Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 3,468
|
Quote:
Ultimately, camber will be better on ice and hardpack. Catching an edge really shouldn't be an issue for people that have at least a year or two under their belt. Some people like the various edge techs like mange-traction/frostbite edges, etc. I prefer to go back to basics: A good, fairly stiff, cambered deck with as much effective edge as possible. A rockered nose isn't a bad thing though... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Milwaukee Suburbs
Posts: 1,920
|
I loved the magnatraction on my Skatebanana. I'm in se WI and my local hill gets tons of heavy traffic and very hard packed conditions at times. That board was great to me.
I went with a Arbor Westmark with Griptech, I love the overall feeling of this board. I do everything with it though, groomers, jumps and park. This year isn't as icy so it's not quite a fair comparison IMO up to this point because the riding conditions aren't as bad as last year. None-the-less still loving the Westmark.
__________________
Thanks -Slyder |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | ||
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: S.E. Mich.
Posts: 799
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Now that I've progressed some with my riding, I've noticed that my Arbor Roundhouse bites and holds a line much better, with more stability and control at speeds I just wasn't comfortable with last season. Would my conclusion regarding that observation be on point?
__________________
You're only Young Once,.. but you can be Immature FOREVER!!!! ![]() 2012/13 Season; (48) days out! |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Resident Creep-o-saurus
![]() Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 3,468
|
Quote:
As far as stiffness goes you're probably right, at slower speeds (i.e. just cruising at 30 km/h or less) a stiff board might actually be a hindrance. I still wouldn't want a wet noodle for "sight seeing" but a medium flex, medium length camber board would be just right methinks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Resident Creep-o-saurus
![]() Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 3,468
|
Quote:
Not only do they have their own snowboard:![]() Animal, I mean I, am a member of the US team!!! ![]() Not to start the whole bumpy edge vs. straight edge argument again, but answer me one question. How many people that compete in alpine, boardercross, or any other event where you need edgehold on hardpack, have bumpy edges? Almost none, if none. ![]() OP, if you can demo similar boards one with and one without the fancy edges, maybe it'll help make your mind up!?! |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|