![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Stowe, VT
Posts: 47
|
How does everyone feel about Flying V tech from Burton? I've heard a mixed bag, pros being contact and pop/flex, cons being edge hold on hard pack and speed.
I love the idea of the rocker-camber-rocker profile, just curious what everyone else thinks about its real life application
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Belgium
Posts: 108
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4
|
Quote:
![]() In my eyes it's to little to make a change, I don't notice the difference between normal Burton Rocker without, then Flying V with it... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Toledo, OH
Posts: 70
|
I have a capita TFA, a GNU DK, and a Burton Custom Restricted with frostbite and under general/average snow conditions I feel like the Burton washes out the most, the other two I rarely if ever wash out on. On ice though I feel like they are all about equal. To be honest, I'm not a Burton Hater, but I probably won't buy another Burton board again. If I didn't already own it and could sell it I would (you practically have to give a custom restricted away to get rid of it). Here's a video some of you may appreciate from the House Board Shop testing a bunch of different manufacturers' edge hold on ice.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRIt2rna2Pk |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|