Lib Tech 2014 Snowboards - Page 3 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
SnowboardingForum.com is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-04-2013, 09:55 PM   #21 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: winchester, VA
Posts: 127
Default

CK, do you consider it to be a pretty damp board?
sidewall is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 02-04-2013, 10:02 PM   #22 (permalink)
Member
 
CK93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 98
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sidewall View Post
CK, do you consider it to be a pretty damp board?
Well I went from a Burton Custom X to the Hot Knife. So it is more damp than that, but I think its a great flex. Only issues I have now is sometimes hard to keep heelside edge, but I think thats more due to how I ride. I have ridden boards more damp and didn't like them.

But on a scale version if that is what your looking for, around 6-7 maybe?
I like it, its right where I like.
CK93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 10:08 PM   #23 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: winchester, VA
Posts: 127
Default

Okay cool. I'm looking for something more damp than my T. Rice.
sidewall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 10:27 PM   #24 (permalink)
Member
 
CK93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 98
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sidewall View Post
Okay cool. I'm looking for something more damp than my T. Rice.
From what I hear the TRS is very close to the T. Rice but more damp. you might want to look into that.
CK93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 11:08 PM   #25 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,966
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CK93 View Post
From what I hear the TRS is very close to the T. Rice but more damp. you might want to look into that.
No, quite many differences between the TRS and the T. Rice. Most important ones are that the T. Rice is wider and significantly stiffer (but there are a lot of others - different cores, different Magnetractions, different bases, different bevels, etc.).

As a result the T. Rice is more stable, has slightly better float, suits bigger footed riders, etc.
In contrast, the TRS is a lot more playful, agile/quicker edge-to-edge, turn-happy, etc.
hktrdr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 11:57 PM   #26 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 465
Default

Wiredsport, did you get the skinny on the Brando by Lando? I can make out from the pic that it's C2. Is it just the regular Lando with a different graphic?
buggravy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013, 08:47 AM   #27 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 220
Default

skunk ape HP and Attack bananer look sooo dope
jbernste03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013, 08:57 AM   #28 (permalink)
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Wiredsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,239
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by buggravy View Post
Wiredsport, did you get the skinny on the Brando by Lando? I can make out from the pic that it's C2. Is it just the regular Lando with a different graphic?
Yes, C2. No mention of any changes.
Wiredsport is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013, 09:14 AM   #29 (permalink)
Member
 
CK93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 98
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hktrdr View Post
No, quite many differences between the TRS and the T. Rice. Most important ones are that the T. Rice is wider and significantly stiffer (but there are a lot of others - different cores, different Magnetractions, different bases, different bevels, etc.).

As a result the T. Rice is more stable, has slightly better float, suits bigger footed riders, etc.
In contrast, the TRS is a lot more playful, agile/quicker edge-to-edge, turn-happy, etc.

hktrdr,where were you when I posted this a fews days back? LOL

http://www.snowboardingforum.com/boa...vs-t-rice.html

Didn't get much replies, but that is what I going off of.
CK93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013, 09:24 AM   #30 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,966
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CK93 View Post
hktrdr,where were you when I posted this a fews days back? LOL

http://www.snowboardingforum.com/boa...vs-t-rice.html

Didn't get much replies, but that is what I going off of.
Looks to me like people in that thread told you pretty much exactly the same about the boards' features as I did. Only things I added was the point about the bevel and then the riding characteristics.
hktrdr is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums