Powder/Tree Riding questions - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 8 (permalink) Old 02-08-2013, 07:25 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Powder/Tree Riding questions

Hey,

My favorite style of riding is through powder and specifically tree runs. I currently have a 162 camber board but was hoping to get a hybrid board now. Is it wise to get a shorter board to be more agile in the trees? Or will I lose a lot of float? I was looking at a 158cm board. Pros/Cons?

All the Best
Guitar-Zan is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 8 (permalink) Old 02-08-2013, 07:32 PM
Veteran Member
 
redlude97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Seattle/Portland
Posts: 1,134
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Hard to say without knowing your weight. In general going with a hybrid camber will make the same length board more agile all other aspects of the board being similar(stiffness sidecut etc)
redlude97 is offline  
post #3 of 8 (permalink) Old 02-08-2013, 07:41 PM
Reformed Creep-o-saurus
 
poutanen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 6,375
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 132 Post(s)
I also love the trees and powder, but I have gone up in size with every board I've bought (albeit only by 1 cm for the last board).

You have to ask yourself this, are you talking about spending a lot of time in really dense trees? If so then short is good. But if you're talking about maintaining decent speed and carving turns in the trees, then I'd stick to a board length suitable for freeriding at your weight.
poutanen is offline  
post #4 of 8 (permalink) Old 02-08-2013, 07:44 PM
Veteran Member
 
extra0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 655
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
generally, you will lose float with a 158...but I don't know your stats, how deep the powder you're talking about or how steep your mtn is.

I ride a 163 around my relatively flat mtn when it dumps like 2+ feet and it floats great...plenty agile, too (keeping in mind west coast trees are among the largest and most spaced out on earth). The 163 also hangs in there when we get those occasional waist to stomach dumps.
extra0 is offline  
post #5 of 8 (permalink) Old 02-08-2013, 07:58 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hey,

Thanks I'm 6 1" and 185 lbs. I mix it up I crash a lot in the dense trees lol but I am progressing.
Guitar-Zan is offline  
post #6 of 8 (permalink) Old 02-08-2013, 08:25 PM
Veteran Member
 
extra0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 655
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
my stats exactly. where do you ride?
extra0 is offline  
post #7 of 8 (permalink) Old 02-08-2013, 08:53 PM
Veteran Member
 
dreampow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Kyoto Japan
Posts: 1,231
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guitar-Zan View Post
Hey,

Thanks I'm 6 1" and 185 lbs. I mix it up I crash a lot in the dense trees lol but I am progressing.
It depends on the terrain.

Steeper terrain or light pow and float is less of an issue, flatter terrain or heavier pow and you may want to stay at 161 or 162.

I personally ride a 157/158 (I weigh 175) for that kind of stuff, but something with some rocker as opposed to full posi camber. I am on an NS proto right now and its superb for this kind of riding IMO. I used to ride a 161 Volkl with posi camber in (Nagano Japan) and the camber rocker profile gives me way more float even at the shorter length.

Having said that I am pretty experienced at this kind of riding so I know how to stay afloat with less effort and almost never hit trees.

The more you ride the less you need to put on the brakes and keeping your momentum is key to stay afloat.

158 or 161 is not a big difference, the shorter length will be more agile and the longer will have slightly better float and stability at speed.

From what you said so far I would say jump on a hybrid 161. It will be easier to flip from edge to edge than your current deck so more nimble and will give much better float.
dreampow is offline  
post #8 of 8 (permalink) Old 02-09-2013, 01:49 AM
ETM
Veteran Member
 
ETM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Japan
Posts: 2,451
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
The type of camber has way less effect on the performance of the board than the shape and camber profile of the nose. Something with a short stubby nose like a neversummer will never be as good as something with a longer smoother nose lift like a prior. I do a lot of tight tree riding at speed and i do it on a 180. If you can handle the board else where on the mountain you can handle it in the trees IMO.
ETM is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome