![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 446
|
The Proto and the Greats are comparable. The Rice is stiffer and much more of a charging board so it doesn't really match with the other two. But overall, all three are very good boards. Use the search function and you will find LOADS of info, especially on these exact boards.
"Riding at resorts" really doesn't say much about your riding style. Is it park, groomers, jumps? Would you rather go fast or play around? That would help us finding your board. Last edited by Basti; 02-21-2013 at 01:48 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 683
|
I have Proto and T. Rice... nothing alike... stay away from the T. Rice. I have them both because they are so different. I ride the Proto (157) almost every day I'm out. I use the T. Rice (161.5) for legit powder days +12". You could say the Proto is my "resort" board. The T. Rice is just to burley and not practical for every day use, especially if you are just riding groomers all day. Go Proto, SL or YES.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 7
|
I like to go fast, hit small to medium jumps, try the park (beginner on boxes), intermediate level rider but not even close to being a rock star.
When I rode the T Rice Pro, if felt so confidence inspiring. The Greats felt similar to trad camber boards I've ridden in the past. A buddy told me that I'd probably like the Proto CT. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 683
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Clarkston, WA
Posts: 230
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 202
|
I have a Yes great beauties from last year. Love it. I recently demoed the NS proto and SL, nice too, good build quality but did not like the feel of rocker between the bindings. For me, I much prefer the camrock profile. Much more stable to me and still gives you rocker at the tips.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|