Machete GT or Jones Mountain twin? - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 8 (permalink) Old 03-04-2013, 05:46 PM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 42
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Machete GT or Jones Mountain twin?

I have searched all through the site and and can't really find any useful info on these that will help me make a decision. All 'reviews' online are either short quick circle jerk grabs or just a description of the board telling you it would be great for so and so.
I would like to know just how much camber is in the MGT and if the mountain twin is as 'damp' in comparison.
The GT is easier to get and frankly, cheaper so thats my preference but would be good to hear from guys (or girls) who have ridden both.

I am 5'8'', maybe 170lbs (with gear) and live in Aus.
Done a couple of seasons now and feeling comfortable at a fair pace. Spend a bit of time off the groomers and we don't really get that much in the way of powder.
been riding a 156 signal omni but it gets a bit chattery and edge hold is a little sketchywhen you wind it out.

Want something that's stable at speed, especially in tracked out stuff and hard pack. NO park stuff at all and my hunting around has led me to these two (amongst others but leaning towards these...) that might suit the bill.

Cheers in advance for any input.
jellyjam is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 8 (permalink) Old 03-04-2013, 05:49 PM
Senior Member
 
Treegreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Utah
Posts: 240
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
For your Machete GT question you may find that answer easier to get at Ride Snowboards - Ride Nation Forum. People like Mr. Tidbit sometimes visit this forum, but you're much more likely to get that kind of specific technical question answered quickly via Ride's forum where their designers/reps hang out. Afraid I can't be of much use otherwise.
Treegreen is offline  
post #3 of 8 (permalink) Old 03-04-2013, 05:57 PM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 42
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Cheers for that.
I hadn't ever seen that place.
I'll have a look around.
jellyjam is offline  
post #4 of 8 (permalink) Old 03-04-2013, 06:13 PM
Veteran Member
 
redlude97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Seattle/Portland
Posts: 1,134
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
If you wait until next year the buckup may be a better choice since it has less rocker. Another would be a berzerker or dh2 depending on what type of sidecut you like
redlude97 is offline  
post #5 of 8 (permalink) Old 03-05-2013, 03:12 PM
Veteran Member
 
Nivek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Mordor
Posts: 7,501
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 102 Post(s)
I have not been on the Mtn Twin so comparison is gone. But I have ridden the GT. Personally I dont think it was accessible enough. For someone that has the strength to muscle around a 58 Highlife or a 61 Flow Maverick I shouldnt have had as much trouble as I did getting to the deeper part of the sidecut or getting snap from the tips of a 151. It was just too stiff through the camber zone in my opinion. If you're the type that seems to find most jump oriented decks too soft then you might just be the right rider for the GT, otherwise I think it takes too much effort to ride for the average rider.

As a note on the Twin, it's not true twin. Directional flex and directional camrock. Also in the past Jones have been characteristically harsh riding. Not nice to the body in any choppy cruddy conditions.

Snowboarding Is...

That thing I do to escape the world and have fun with my friends
Nivek is offline  
post #6 of 8 (permalink) Old 03-06-2013, 07:15 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,966
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nivek View Post
As a note on the Twin, it's not true twin. Directional flex and directional camrock. Also in the past Jones have been characteristically harsh riding. Not nice to the body in any choppy cruddy conditions.
That plus setback.
hktrdr is offline  
post #7 of 8 (permalink) Old 03-06-2013, 11:13 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 66
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nivek View Post
I have not been on the Mtn Twin so comparison is gone. But I have ridden the GT. Personally I dont think it was accessible enough. For someone that has the strength to muscle around a 58 Highlife or a 61 Flow Maverick I shouldnt have had as much trouble as I did getting to the deeper part of the sidecut or getting snap from the tips of a 151. It was just too stiff through the camber zone in my opinion. If you're the type that seems to find most jump oriented decks too soft then you might just be the right rider for the GT, otherwise I think it takes too much effort to ride for the average rider.

As a note on the Twin, it's not true twin. Directional flex and directional camrock. Also in the past Jones have been characteristically harsh riding. Not nice to the body in any choppy cruddy conditions.
Out of curiosity, how long did you ride the Machete GT for?


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Mr_Tidbit is offline  
post #8 of 8 (permalink) Old 03-07-2013, 05:35 PM
Veteran Member
 
Nivek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Mordor
Posts: 7,501
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 102 Post(s)
3-4 top to bottom runs. So if it hadnt been ridden it would need to be broken in. But in the same day I also rode a 61 Ultra Dream, 55 Berzerker, and a 61 Maverick. All of which I could get into the sidecuts and get into the tips easier. The nextt day I rode a brand new Flow Rush 153. Like hadn't cracked the glass yet new, carbon in the tips, Quadrax glass, and still I could get into that easier. Incidently that same amount of time on the Berzerker was enough to solidify it as one of my favorite no-park-everything-else boards I've ever ridden.

Snowboarding Is...

That thing I do to escape the world and have fun with my friends

Last edited by Nivek; 03-07-2013 at 05:40 PM.
Nivek is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome