Rome Snowboards and Rider Weight - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
SnowboardingForum.com is the premier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-04-2013, 06:10 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
FireStarter451's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 106
Default Rome Snowboards and Rider Weight

So I've checked out a few board sizing calculators, and recommendations, and I noticed that Rome snowboards are recommended for much lighter persons than the calculators and recommendations say.

According to snowboardsizingguide.com and frostyrider.com, a female 180 to 190 lbs can ride a board that's 153 cm long.

The Rome Vynil snowboard (women's) that I saw on evo.com has a suggested rider weight of 105 to 150 lbs. That's a huge difference.
Rome Vinyl Rocker Snowboard - Women's 2012 | evo outlet

Are Rome not capable of supporting a heavy person like most other boards?

I realize this is a manufacturer recommendation and it would be silly to ignore it, but why such a large disparity from other boards?

Will the board just break under a heavier rider?
FireStarter451 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 03-04-2013, 06:34 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
sxdaca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 131
Default

im 190lbs and ride an artifact rocker 155 wide. its doing fine
sxdaca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 06:52 PM   #3 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
Sudden_Death's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Ottawa, On
Posts: 737
Default

Could be a way around warranty claims. If most people riding the board are over the recommended weight even though it "should" be the right size then they can claim it was the riders weight that caused the problem.
Sudden_Death is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 07:02 PM   #4 (permalink)
Official SBF Blogger
 
david_z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Detroit suburbs
Posts: 3,391
Blog Entries: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FireStarter451 View Post
According to snowboardsizingguide.com and frostyrider.com...
Well there's your problem.

Always use the manufacturers suggested weight range, or the middle of that suggested weight range, as a starting point.

Skill, experience, riding style, what you want to get out of the board, etc., are all going to play a part in what size you ultimately want.


E.g., Frosty says I should be riding a 164-166 which is maybe true if this was 2003 and I was riding a directional cambered stick for big-mountain riding. I ride 156-157 in the park and maybe 161 for all-mountain. You couldn't pay me to ride a 166 unless it was a pow-only board.
__________________

Repping the world's smallest mountains... 2013-2014 snow days: 48

Mt. Brighton - 13
Hawk Island - 6
Mt. Holly - 5
Mt. Bohemia - 3
Mt. Tolle - 3
Boyne Mountain - 2
Pine Knob - 2
Crystal Mountain - 2
Treetops - 2
Alpine Valley - 2
Caberfae Peaks - 2
Cannonsburg - 1
Urban - 1
Slackcountry - 1
Nub's Nob - 1
Sugar Mountain, NC - 1
Beech Mountain, NC - 1
david_z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 08:57 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: LI NY
Posts: 470
Default

Rome's ratings on the women's boards seems to run on the high end, ask some of the women on here and they should help out. Got a friend a Vinyl Rocker 148. Rome was recommending a 151, she seems very happy with the 148, probably could have even gotten a size lower.

Edit: She is at 120 lbs.

Last edited by Efilnikufesin; 03-04-2013 at 08:59 PM.
Efilnikufesin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2013, 11:01 AM   #6 (permalink)
Member
 
silverwhale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 43
Default

I noticed this as well when I bought my Rome Gold in December. Based on my weight (around 115-120), their size chart made it seem like I would be better with the 152 (so I would be in the middle of the weight range). After emailing a couple reps from Rome, I ended up getting the 147 (same size as the board I had before that), and am really happy with it even though I was on the upper end of the weight range. I would have been fine going longer as well I think, but I like it a bit shorter for chutes and trees and stuff. It definitely doesn't seem too short compared to the 147 camber board I had before it, so I would be surprised if it was something weird about Rome boards in general. How big is your current board, and is the profile similar to the vinyl rocker?
silverwhale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2013, 11:08 AM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
FireStarter451's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 106
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by silverwhale View Post
How big is your current board, and is the profile similar to the vinyl rocker?
This was going to be a present for a new rider who does not currently own any board.
FireStarter451 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2013, 11:10 AM   #8 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,282
Default

If you're 180/190 depending on foot size you may want to look at men's boards mid-flex probably in the 152 range. Sadly I just don't think you're going to find a woman's board that is designed for your weight, so you'll need to get creative.
bseracka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2013, 11:13 AM   #9 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
trapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: West of Lansing
Posts: 1,368
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by david_z View Post
E.g., Frosty says I should be riding a 164-166 which is maybe true if this was 2003 and I was riding a directional cambered stick for big-mountain riding. I ride 156-157 in the park and maybe 161 for all-mountain. You couldn't pay me to ride a 166 unless it was a pow-only board.
Frosty puts me on a 171 but I ride a 166w and rode a 164w up until this season just fine. I think at this point anything bigger than a 166 would be more than I'd want in absence of powder. So like David said, don't put too much into those types of calculators.

Incidentally, Leo was my snowboard sizing calculator...
trapper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2013, 11:14 AM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
FireStarter451's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 106
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bseracka View Post
If you're 180/190 depending on foot size you may want to look at men's boards mid-flex probably in the 152 range. Sadly I just don't think you're going to find a woman's board that is designed for your weight, so you'll need to get creative.
I noticed that this morning. I went through a whole bunch of women's boards on evo.com and very, very few of them went up that high in rider weight.
FireStarter451 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:37 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums