2014 Burton Custom Flying V - Page 3 - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #21 of 25 (permalink) Old 09-19-2013, 08:59 AM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,609
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Blog Entries: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntipodeanSam View Post
So will the 45 degree carbon highlights improve the edge hold and nose/tail chatter the reviews have complained about?

If so will the board become stiffer (I see they still rate it as a 5 for flex in the new catalogue), therefore less fun to play around on and defeating the object of having this alternative to the camber?!
I think that as an example, if the Flying V and camber versions are same stiffness the FV shape would still have a much higher 'fun factor'. FV turns easier, has a looser, skatey feel etc. the cambered version would be more precise, less forgiving, catchier, but have better edge hold.

On a related note I have always wondered generally about super high tech boards that are noncambered, to me high tech means lightweight and stiff, and I would think that the stiffness aspects are more desirable in cambered boards.
Lamps is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #22 of 25 (permalink) Old 09-19-2013, 09:05 AM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,609
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Blog Entries: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by KentoBento View Post
Last Year, This Year unrelated. How much does the Custom (Flying V and camber) flex. I always thought it was a stiff, kind of like a more aggressive process. Should I want to butter and jib, is the custom not really made for that kind of riding?
I think that the concept of the custom is an all round board, so you can ride it pretty much anywhere, it's a good one board quiver, or a good primary board that you could supplement with a specialized board or more.

Eg you have a custom for most days and a park board or pow board or both to complement it for days you know that's what you want.

I suspect it will compare well vs other generalist sticks but of course can't hold it's own against a specialist board in the specific application.
Lamps is offline  
post #23 of 25 (permalink) Old 09-19-2013, 07:21 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 49
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
SOOO, A solid meh?

Is it on the soft side of generalist or the stiffer side?
Also, I am like 180 lb and I heard Burton boards are made for lighter riders and thus the heavier you are, the softer it gets, is that true?
KentoBento is offline  
post #24 of 25 (permalink) Old 09-19-2013, 08:45 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,966
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lamps View Post
I think that as an example, if the Flying V and camber versions are same stiffness the FV shape would still have a much higher 'fun factor'. FV turns easier, has a looser, skatey feel etc. the cambered version would be more precise, less forgiving, catchier, but have better edge hold.

On a related note I have always wondered generally about super high tech boards that are noncambered, to me high tech means lightweight and stiff, and I would think that the stiffness aspects are more desirable in cambered boards.
Sorry, but that is nonsense - especially the stiffness part. Most high-tech boards tend to be around mid-flex and some are even on the soft side - Burton Antler, NS Proto, etc.
hktrdr is offline  
post #25 of 25 (permalink) Old 09-19-2013, 08:45 PM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,609
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Blog Entries: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by KentoBento View Post
SOOO, A solid meh?

Is it on the soft side of generalist or the stiffer side?
Also, I am like 180 lb and I heard Burton boards are made for lighter riders and thus the heavier you are, the softer it gets, is that true?
I haven't ridden the 2014, 2013 was in my opinion medium or slightly on the stiff side, but still fine for butters etc., its an all around board.

I weight 185, own three different burton boards between 158 and 163, I think if I understand your question, does Burton's longer boards shortchange the top of the weight range, I would say not, stiffness matches my needs across the sizes above.
Lamps is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome