Powder snake/Charlie slasher - Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 33 (permalink) Old 03-15-2013, 05:42 AM Thread Starter
Member
 
spino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 77
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Powder snake/Charlie slasher

hello everyone.
i am currently looking for a powder board (on a budget) and based on what i read i think i have restricted my choice to these two boards.

i will be using it on the italian alps, so not a lot of powder and usually quite wet and heavy.

i am 6"2 and 185lbs, and i currenlty own a twin tip volkl vice sqd 159.
should i get the salomon, i think i would buy the 163, but what about the charlie?
should i go with the 164 as well? if this is the case i think i can get a good deal on this year's model. otherwise i can maybe think of next year's 161?

i have seen a 2012 powder snake online @ 240 : is it very different from this year's model? this might be a killer deal i think.

lastly: up until now i have always ridden a twin stance (12/-12) but with this deck i would like to try a more directional one.
i am a bit scared of going fully directional though: might be something like 21/-6 a good starting point?
spino is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 33 (permalink) Old 03-15-2013, 06:11 AM
Senior Member
 
Basti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 448
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Both are great boards so you can't really go wrong.

As for stance, I would start with +18/-9. That way you don't have too much of a weird feeling and see how you like it. I found that for powder and freeriding the angle don't have to be crazy directional. Have fun trying!
Basti is offline  
post #3 of 33 (permalink) Old 03-15-2013, 09:29 AM Thread Starter
Member
 
spino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 77
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
hi basti
thanks for the kind reply.

in your opinion, what size would suit me the best?
i am 85 kg. for example the snake 160 is suggested up to 90 kg, but i am trying to find the right balance between float and manoeuvrability...
spino is offline  
post #4 of 33 (permalink) Old 03-15-2013, 09:51 AM
ETM
Veteran Member
 
ETM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Japan
Posts: 2,424
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
at 6 foot 2 you should be able to throw a 160 around like its nothing
ETM is offline  
post #5 of 33 (permalink) Old 03-15-2013, 09:54 AM Thread Starter
Member
 
spino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 77
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
hi ETM, thanks!
yes, i think so. in fact, i currently ride a 159.
my doubt is if i'd better go with the 163 (or charlie 164), instead.
would it be difficult to turn in the trees?
spino is offline  
post #6 of 33 (permalink) Old 03-15-2013, 10:00 AM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mountains
Posts: 11,672
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Ride your stance where you want it not where you think you should because of the type of board. I ride all decks 18 negative 15 regardless of shape, camber, or style.

I've ridden the 63 Powder Snake before it's fun, nimble, and crushes pow. You're bigger than I am so I wouldn't think it would be an issue.

Angry Snowboarder Because someone has to call it how they see it!
BurtonAvenger is offline  
post #7 of 33 (permalink) Old 03-15-2013, 10:04 AM
ETM
Veteran Member
 
ETM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Japan
Posts: 2,424
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by spino View Post
hi ETM, thanks!
yes, i think so. in fact, i currently ride a 159.
my doubt is if i'd better go with the 163 (or charlie 164), instead.
would it be difficult to turn in the trees?
Im 6 foot 3 and ride full throttle through trees on a 180 so if you ask me a 164 is still nothing lol. Easily managable in trees
ETM is offline  
post #8 of 33 (permalink) Old 03-15-2013, 10:05 AM Thread Starter
Member
 
spino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 77
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BurtonAvenger View Post
Ride your stance where you want it not where you think you should because of the type of board. I ride all decks 18 negative 15 regardless of shape, camber, or style.

I've ridden the 63 Powder Snake before it's fun, nimble, and crushes pow. You're bigger than I am so I wouldn't think it would be an issue.
thanks!
your review is one of the main reasons i am considering this board.
i guess i will go bigger, than. after all, this will be primarily a powder board for me, so probably there is no point in downsizing.

as for the stance, it is actually my coach who suggested a more positive stance for pow riding.
but i have never actually tried. also, consider this is just my seconde seasons of snowboarding.
i can go basically anywhere with good confidence, but i still struggle when there is more than 1" of fresh powder. even if it is sooo addictive!
spino is offline  
post #9 of 33 (permalink) Old 03-15-2013, 10:10 AM
ETM
Veteran Member
 
ETM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Japan
Posts: 2,424
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
your "coach" sounds a bit suss if hes saying that.
ETM is offline  
post #10 of 33 (permalink) Old 03-15-2013, 10:22 AM Thread Starter
Member
 
spino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 77
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BurtonAvenger View Post
Ride your stance where you want it not where you think you should because of the type of board. I ride all decks 18 negative 15 regardless of shape, camber, or style.

I've ridden the 63 Powder Snake before it's fun, nimble, and crushes pow. You're bigger than I am so I wouldn't think it would be an issue.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ETM View Post
your "coach" sounds a bit suss if hes saying that.
i don't know.
he's a certified trainer with 15 years of experience. and he can of course rip it with any stance and any board (hardboots included).
in any case, i will give it a try: i always thought with a slightly directional stance would be a bit easier to steer the board with the back foot, and should make pointing straight downhill a bit easier.

out of curiosity: what is your stance? i have watched with admiration and envy many of the vids you recently posted, but i could not tell.
spino is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowboarding Forum - Snowboard Enthusiast Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome