![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mountains
Posts: 8,168
|
You are talking about the MC kink and not the Ride kink?
__________________
Angry Snowboarder Because someone has to call it how they see it! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mountains
Posts: 8,168
|
I rode the MCKink and would have to say its one of the stiffest boards I've ridden that was geared for all mountain use. It has an elongated contact point with a really snubbed out nose. The TRS is going to have a softer flex to it, lower end base, and a directional shape.
__________________
Angry Snowboarder Because someone has to call it how they see it! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Libtech rates the MC kink a 5.5 on a scale of ten and the TRS a 5 as far as stiffness goes (comparable sizes) and they call it a radial twin?? whats that BA?? not directional twin... also I belive they both have the TNT base for 09 Last edited by oneplankawanka; 10-06-2008 at 09:45 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mountains
Posts: 8,168
|
Its not a jib board at all. Lib Tech once again LIES!
__________________
Angry Snowboarder Because someone has to call it how they see it! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mountains
Posts: 8,168
|
Some of their boards aren't bad but I find a lot of hype pushes them more than anything else.
__________________
Angry Snowboarder Because someone has to call it how they see it! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|